Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU to Holder: Zimmerman case is over
breitbart.com ^ | 7/21/2013 | Lisa De Pasquale

Posted on 07/21/2013 12:14:08 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

In a letter from the ACLU to Attorney General Eric Holder:

*snip*

Even though the Supreme Court permits a federal prosecution following a state prosecution, the ACLU believes the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution protects someone from being prosecuted in another court for charges arising from the same transaction. A jury found Zimmerman not guilty, and that should be the end of the criminal case.


(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: aclu; blackrage; doj; holder; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last
To: piytar

He can be tried in federal court, but NOT because Fed and state are separate. He can be tried because the “crimes” are different. Murder vs. “hate crime”, however, I think one could argue in federal court that he can’t be convicted of a hate crime without murder being a part of that. The ONLY thing he did to Martin was kill him. Without considering murder, you have no crime. If you have no crime, you can’t prove what his attitude was. Murder can not be considered in federal court because then THAT would be double jeopardy.


81 posted on 07/22/2013 5:59:24 AM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
So, ACLU, does the Double Jeopardy Clause contain an exception for crimes committed by cops on duty?

No, but it's much more logical to charge cops a second time with Federal civil rights violations because they are acting under the color of law. Zimmerman was a private citizen, so there really is no coherent Federal case to be made against him. In this rare case, the ACLU is actually setting aside its collectivist agenda for a moment and telling the truth.

82 posted on 07/22/2013 6:08:18 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

In a case that is obviously groundless for additional prosecution, the ACLU is simply getting itself some cheap publicity by standing on the side of the obvious.

If there had been the slightest shred of evidence upon which the federal prosecution could have gone forward, the ACLU would have either kept its mouth shut and it’s finger to the wind, or it would have been cheerleading from the sidelines, all based on their perception of the strength of the case.

They are carrion eaters.


83 posted on 07/22/2013 6:14:12 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray; x1stcav

Just goes to show the abuses of power and the current police state/Banana Republic stink so much as to turn off even some of the hard-core Leftist base.

Pretty outstanding, IMHO.


84 posted on 07/22/2013 7:02:44 AM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
People can e-mail Sanford.Florida@usdoj.gov if they have thoughts on how the department should proceed.

Check around while you're up there.


85 posted on 07/22/2013 8:17:44 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Remember... the first revolutionary was Satan."--Russian Orthodox Archpriest Dmitry Smirnov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Attorney Corporal Holder probably thinks that the ACLU is an organization of cowards.
86 posted on 07/22/2013 8:17:52 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If Obama Had A City It Would Look Like Detroit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Dream On....Holder and Obama are fascists...they see far too much rascist propaganda value remaining that they can dedicate to the destruction of the US Constitution, to leave the Trayvon Martin case ( its no longer the Zimmerman Case) alone.

Holder and Obama are treasonous usurpers and both should be impeached, and Congress needs to get on with it.


87 posted on 07/22/2013 8:52:18 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Anyone doubt that Holder will use NSA and the IRS and any other agency he can to get Zimmerman and his family members?


88 posted on 07/22/2013 12:08:16 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
So, ACLU, does the Double Jeopardy Clause contain an exception for crimes committed by cops on duty?

There have been cases where cops who crimes were subjected to sham prosecutions. In such cases, it would seem that federal prosecution might be appropriate but the federal government should first have to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the first prosecution was a sham that it never subjected the defendant to any "real" jeopardy (e.g. the judge issued a directed verdict because the prosecution failed to show that the crime was committed in the county where the case was being tried); additionally, a jury that ultimately hears the case should likewise be presented with enough information about the original case to allow them to decide whether the prosecution was done in good faith, or was done in bad faith with the intention of avoiding putting the defendant in any real jeopardy.

If cops want to be subject to all of the same protections as everyone else, on the same terms, they should be subject to the same rules as well. Exemptions from rules which would apply to ordinary citizens carry with them extra responsibilities. Cops who are not willing to accept and honor those responsibilities should be instantly subject to the same rules as anyone else.

89 posted on 07/22/2013 4:03:33 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson