Posted on 07/18/2013 6:54:39 PM PDT by Whenifhow
Unless you engage in anal sex or intravenous drug use, your chances of contracting HIV are negligible.
Reporting requirements have been escalating for several years (e.g. Physician Quality Reporting System).
bookmarked—Thanks, Whenifhow.
Quarantine? I thought not.
AIDS is a collection of diseases that existed long before the discovery of “HIV”. The experts say that if you have HIV plus one of the AIDS defining illnesses then you have AIDS itself. But what if HIV isn’t the cause of AIDS - and instead, repeated exposure to unsafe sex, recreational drugs, unsanitary conditions and unhealthy lifestyles are what leads to the eventual breakdown of the immune system???
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/video/
When this goes into effect, unless you are over 65, you will get a blood test for AIDS the next time you go to the Vet clinic/hospital. Be aware of that and if you normally have a blood test when you go, ask if they are going to check you for AIDS. I don’t know if you can refuse it. Once they get the blood for any reason, such as checking your sugar, kidneys, you won’t know if they also check you for AIDS.
I’m over 65, so they should leave me alone. It ticks me off that our half white president Hussein’s friends are homosexuals and WE have to have a blood test due to THEIR diseased sexual perversion.
Plus, if you noticed, the AIDS check and treatment for these freak’s AIDS is totally free, paid for by our half white president HUSSEIN’S government - OUR TAXES.
“By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution...”
Constitution? What’s the Constitution to this man????
“Year Estimated new HIV infections”
In a world like this, there is no reason to believe that such data is true. Ever.
That would still be a matter ONLY for the executive branch.
According to the Constitution, only Congress can make laws. The President simply cannot. Also, Congress cannot delegate lawmaking.
My doctor owns land in Costa Rica. He and several of his friends plan to move there once this mess festers.
I believe there was one executive order that congress recently nullified. I don’t recall at the moment what it was, but I do remember Michele Bachmann talking about it.
Anyone recall that?
The fact that it happened once and no one can remember it... speaks volumes.
LLS
Somebody dropped a lot of calculation digits between actuaries and OMB.
Unbelievable. Thank you for the ping on this one, NautiNurse!
Congress/ House Revokes EO Jan 2, 2013
House Passes Congressional Pay Freeze, 129 Members Vote for Pay Increase
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2974262/posts
The House approved a bill to rescind the executive order President Obama signed last week that ended the pay freeze on federal employees, which meant that some federal workers would be getting a raise—including members of Congress. A number of lawmakers spoke out about the absurdity of the pay increase and timing of the move. Rep. Michele Bachmann said in a statement, “This executive order was not requested by Congress and we should reject it. We have a spending problem in our country and we should be looking for areas to cut spending. At a time when families across the country are cutting back we should not increase government spending and add to the debt burden by giving members of Congress a pay raise.”
People used to die of HIV - now they collect ‘disability’ the rest of their lives while ‘suffering’ from something like a mild cold.
Report: Rand Paul to introduce bill nullifying Obama’s executive orders on guns
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2979211/posts
Why doesn’t Rand mention the Court’s clarification that constitutionally undefined executive orders have no teeth without Congress’s legislative support?
Executive Order
In fact, why are the public schools evidently not teaching that the Founding States made the Constitution’s Sections 1-3 of Article I to clarify that all legislative powers of the federal government are vested in the elected members of Congress, Congress therefore having a monopoly on federal legislative powers whether it wants it or not. (But what are legislative powers the people ask in unison?)
11 posted on Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:01:31 PM by Amendment10
“According to the Constitution, only Congress can make laws. The President simply cannot. Also, Congress cannot delegate lawmaking.”
If congress doesn’t object within a certain time period, an Executive Order becomes law.
Silence, peasants! The PharOhbama has spoken.
BTW you cannot get through to Cry Baby’s office, you get the answering machine which is FULL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.