Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Left Wants Your Guns
The Excellence In Broadcating Network ^ | July 16, 2013 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 07/16/2013 7:48:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Connor in Norwood, Massachusetts. Connor, I'm glad you waited. Welcome to the EIB Network. Hi.

CALLER: Thanks, Rush. You're nice to have me on.

RUSH: You bet, sir.

CALLER: Excellent. So there's press release yesterday. La Raza is joining up with the NAALCP saying they want the DOJ to take action on this case, which I presume is probably civil rights charges, though, they don't say it. I was wondering what you think of La Raza and why they're not standing up for Zimmerman.

RUSH: Well, that's not all that hard to understand. La Raza is a liberal, left-wing, socialist group -- and the socialist, left-wing, liberal group view on this is to support Trayvon Martin, because America is racist. In fact, you know what I'm gonna do? I got an e-mail from a guy this morning. I want to read portions of this to you, because I think, Connor, this will answer your question pretty well.

Dennis Bowman is the man who wrote a book on my grandfather, Rush Limbaugh, Sr. He's traveled internationally, and he sent an e-mail today. I'm gonna paraphrase it. That's the best thing to do. One of the aspects of this that Obama has chosen to take is the gun control aspect, that Zimmerman had a gun, that the real problem here was not racism or profiling or any of that or even gay-bashing.

The problem was a gun.

The other day, Obama actually called for passing a new gun control law in response to this. Now, we all know that the left, if they could, would take everybody's guns away from us. No matter what they say, that's what they would do if they could. If they could, they'd eliminate the Second Amendment of the Constitution. If they could, they'd send authorities door-to-door, and they would collect every gun owned by every citizen. We know that. You know it and I know it.

Why do they wish to deprive us of guns?

If they deprive us of guns, they have deprived us of one of the ways we can protect ourselves against the criminal element -- and that, in turn, would make us more dependent on government for protection: The police, law enforcement authorities. What it is rooted in is if you can't protect yourself, you have to have somebody else do it. The left wants total control. One of the reasons they hate guns is because guns offer independence.

And I am not exaggerating.

Now, they'll tell you they hate guns 'cause they kill people and it's vicious and it's mean and it's all these horrible, rotten things. But the gun to the liberal -- a gun to a leftist -- is a huge threat. Liberals want the government running as much of your life as possible. If you have a gun, you can protect yourself. You don't need, at the store, the cops to show up. So if by taking away everybody's guns, they can remove the ability to resist criminals, then the desire to stand up for one's constitutional rights and limited government's not far behind.

If people would willingly give up their guns and say, "Okay, I'll give up my own self-defense and self-protection and I'll turn it over to you" -- the left figures if they could pull that off -- then you'll turn everything over to government at some point. It's just a matter of time before you give up your whole life to them. If they can remove your individual will to resist criminals on your own and instead sit around and hope and pray that somebody from the government shows up, the police force or whatever, then they think it isn't long before you'll give up everything.

In Europe, the thought of shooting someone, even in self-defense, is unfathomable. If you go to Europe, you will routinely run into people who will be shocked and perplexed -- dumbfounded -- that, in the United States, a homicide is justifiable self-defense. In Europe, they've already given up the right to self-defense. In Europe they have given up the notion of protecting themselves, including from foreign attack.

They don't even have departments of defense, much less their own self-defense. They've given up it all. They look at this Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman thing, and the average, ordinary European who's given up all of his rights, can't believe that a homicide is permissible even in self-defense. They can't understand it. So Obama, he just is the constant chipping away of constitutional rights. So the answer to your question, "Where's La Raza?"

La Raza's on the side of big government.

George Zimmerman practiced self-defense. That's not healthy. That's an obstacle to what the left wants. Now, they want you to believe they're upset because George Zimmerman killed a black guy. When you get right down to it, that's not what bothers 'em. It's the gun. It's the ability to self-defend. It's the ability to protect one's self-and not need the police, the government, or what have you. That's what really bothers them. But La Raza, the NAACP, you name it: They're all leftist groups, big government.

They are not oriented towards celebrating the individual.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; banglist; blackkk; criminalaliens; democrats; florida; georgezimmerman; govtabuse; gunconfiscation; guncontrol; laraza; liberals; molonlabe; nocompromise; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed; trayvon; trayvonmartin; tyranny; waronliberty; willnotbeinfringed; youwillnotdisarmus; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2013 7:48:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The left wants your guns because they fear you. They fear you will dis over they are criminals perpetrating crimes and you will come for them. They also fear they will lose the debate with you so they want to disarm you so they can kill you.


2 posted on 07/16/2013 7:51:19 PM PDT by ez (Muslims do not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m so happy Rush is with us... he’s a blessing.


3 posted on 07/16/2013 7:53:44 PM PDT by GOPJ (Department of Justice to Americans:'How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Rush nailed it.


4 posted on 07/16/2013 7:54:21 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When the only citizens who have guns are criminals, I guess I’ll just be a criminal.


5 posted on 07/16/2013 7:54:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good. Let them start in Chi-Congo. When they’ve collected all the stolen guns we’ll talk.


6 posted on 07/16/2013 7:55:30 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The left wants total control. One of the reasons they hate guns is because guns offer independence.

More than that, a firearm is defiance with the high likelihood of success. The Left is good at only one thing, and that is identifying enemies. They don't want to control us, they want to kill us.

7 posted on 07/16/2013 7:56:32 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It's the ability to self-defend. It's the ability to protect one's self-and not need the police, the government, or what have you.

Precisely.

8 posted on 07/16/2013 7:57:02 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Global collectivism is easier to enforce on disarmed individuals than on armed individuals.


9 posted on 07/16/2013 7:57:48 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez
IMHO, there are two types of anti-gunners.

Type 1 are the ignorant. They believe media *facts* and *statistics* and they truly, sincerely believe society would be safer, better and less violent if access to guns were greatly or completely restricted. They have never been around firearms or knowledgeable firearm owners. They have been fed lies and formed their opinions on the basis of them. In many cases, these people can be cured with a trip to the range and exposure to the truth.

Type 2 are far more insidious. They understand that a firearm means a degree of autonomy and independence. It is a means of resisting heavy-handed tyranny, and they can not abide that their perceived lessers would have the temerity to possess such means.

10 posted on 07/16/2013 8:01:57 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think this is the first time Rush has talked about guns and made sense.

I am glad he got that e-mail.


11 posted on 07/16/2013 8:04:04 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ez

Yep. To the government guns are not to protect yourself against criminals. They don’t want you to have them so you can’t protect yourself from the government.


12 posted on 07/16/2013 8:08:54 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

For the same reason they want universal health care.
CONTROL


13 posted on 07/16/2013 8:11:01 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Why do they want us all on public transit packed in cities?
CONTROL


14 posted on 07/16/2013 8:12:52 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The ultimate measure of Marxist dictators is mass murder. So far, Mao is in the lead.


15 posted on 07/16/2013 8:15:13 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They want your guns (not mine; they were all lost in various bizarre ways) because the one-party rule they are striving for will be worthless if the country is still armed to the teeth.
They know that, as long as we have a meaningful 2nd Amendment, we will also have a meaningful 1st Amendment.


16 posted on 07/16/2013 8:17:56 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Left wishes to confiscate our guns because only after guns have been confiscated can the greedy middle class and rich people be “convinced” to “donate “ their accumulated wealth to the “people” (government ) for redistribution those under served members of society who have greater needs.

Seriously, this is how it was explained to me by a group of committed Leftists 20 years ago.

Sounds crazy, but these people are now pretty high up in the Democrat Party in various positions and they have not changed their way of thinking one bit.

17 posted on 07/16/2013 8:25:14 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Lib/prog/socialists want my weapons so when they come for me, it is easier for them to kill me without risk to themselves.


18 posted on 07/16/2013 8:29:29 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5th MEB

SW FEMA HQ is maybe a mile and a half from where I write this. I sleep like a baby.


19 posted on 07/16/2013 8:31:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind each blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Stevie Wonder said he wouldn’t play FL, until they remove the Stand Your Ground law. It wasn’t about po iddle twayyvon, it was about how Zimmerman should not have been allowed to defend himself.

It’s a law which was mentioned in the jury’s instructions but which was not central to this case— the law deals with people who feel threatened, as opposed to someone getting their head bashed in on a sidewalk.


20 posted on 07/16/2013 8:31:48 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson