Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans crafting Dream Act-like immigration bill
The Hill ^ | 7/11/2013

Posted on 07/11/2013 4:33:40 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: i_robot73

My view is yes, the GOP is beyond hope.

However, a newly-sprung third party is likely to be a short-lived failure.

That’s why I advocate using the GOP as the scaffolding by which to build its successor.

I’d start with a tea party-like grassroots organization that organizes statewide nominating conventions before the GOP primaries in 2014, and additionally a national-level one in 2016. Their endorsements would presumably be overwhelmingly if not all within the GOP and many of its members would presumably be members of the GOP as well.

The goal would be to unite small-government conservatives behind a single primary candidate for the 2016 presidential primary, especially, and then to get that candidate to be the GOP nominee—and president.

If the organization succeeds at that, it has a chance of overtaking the GOP from within, but either way it has a nationwide grassroots party apparatus already built that could become a viable third party as early as 2018 if need be.


81 posted on 07/12/2013 6:55:01 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1
No prob, decent nickel.

The Zimmerman case is big, but it's effect is done. The feds and race baiters have already done the damage. It will only affect us if there are riots because of a well deserved acquittal.

I'm thinking we're all so shell shocked from being whupped so often, we're using it as entertainment to escape our bruises.

The big question: If we put our nickels together, will we get a dime back?

:-)

82 posted on 07/12/2013 7:04:12 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I steal taglines - KILL THE BILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I hear you, and I figured a reasoned response would include something like (can we not concentrate on more than one thing at a time). I agree, we should be able to, but the American public is fickle and sometimes easily led (some groups more than others).

I often have to remind myself that on FR, we are still a slice of the distribution - more often on one end of the spectrum, but we are still a slice of it. It can be hard to reconcile that with the idea that we are tightly knit on one end of the spectrum for the most part, but all (or at least a lot of) the other social mores are there in the spectrum as well.


83 posted on 07/12/2013 7:09:47 AM PDT by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1
Put it this way. I wish that we on FR multi-tasked better......

:-)

84 posted on 07/12/2013 7:17:40 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I steal taglines - KILL THE BILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Amen.

LLS


85 posted on 07/12/2013 8:41:15 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
what.. another one?
86 posted on 07/12/2013 8:47:40 AM PDT by Drawn7979
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; markomalley; Lakeshark; Jim Robinson; RedMDer; The Cajun; stephenjohnbanker; Liz

” DEAF, DUMB, SELL-OUT, PANDERING TRAITORS!!!”

That covers it quite well, Onyx.


87 posted on 07/12/2013 9:43:36 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (K I L L T H E B I L L !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark; All

” I have to say, that FR is posting way more than 100 times more on Zimmerman trial threads than on immigration threads is a bad sign. It’s sad where we are putting our attention.”

Yep. We discussed that yesterday.


88 posted on 07/12/2013 9:44:37 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (K I L L T H E B I L L !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

they just wanted us to shut up


89 posted on 07/12/2013 9:54:55 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

IMHO, start with the (L) party. Aside from the few things I think they are ‘wrong’ about, you can’t fault too much when the platform says “I will follow the Constitution”

Like any brand, even re-building from scratch and making things 1000% takes FOREVER to restore credibility/trust...The Republic doesn’t have that kind of time.

“But, you’re for drugs”
- No we’re for Freedom as you belong to no one.
“But, you’re for abortion”
- Here is where I 180 their platform. Egg+Sperm = new DNA = per PERSON
“But, you’re for open borders”
- With few denials, most people are free to enter/leave as they wish. Borders are still enforced, people are still scrutinized. That does not mean the visitor is a Citizen.

What they ARE for, and the GOP won’t even touch, is the systematic dismantling of the ABC departments, the Fed, the 16th (and I’d hope 17th) Amendment, etc. Now, THAT is a bold platform to get behind.

What does the GOP promise? End the Dept. of Educ.? ‘Allowing’ one to keep more of their $$ (thank you, ‘master’)? Amnesty, TSA, NSA. They can’t even pass a BALANCED BUDGET (all Cont. Resolutions @ $4T+ DEFICIT/yr), let alone one for 5+ yrs. out (HA)


90 posted on 07/12/2013 9:55:04 AM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

I’ve got plenty of overlap with small-l libertarians and some with capital-L Libertarians. But IMO they lose the necessary translation from principle to what is pragmatic given human nature and where we are starting from.

A perfect example is their take on immigration. The country does provide, and will continue to provide, social support (even if it weren’t governmental, it would be charitable) of a nature that can’t accommodate the billions who would like to come and avail themselves of it. The open borders that you and they espouse sets us up for invasion (which some could reasonably argue is ongoing from the south) at a level and even of a type that is the first Constitutional duty of our federal government to protect us against. Also, the Libertarian position on immigration ignores the common, Western cultural baseline that is required for Constitutional self-government to work.

The basics of libertarian philosophy can be used to support either side of the abortion debate, and so don’t of themselves provide much practical help on that issue.

It is IMO the small government, reasoned but firm dismantling of those federal (and state) monstrosities is the common ground where conservatives, libertarians, moderates and independents can find a majority coalition and start to take back the government and our country. That’s why the tea party was for a time so successful despite its organizational limitations.

The GOP is so totally sold out and rotten to its core that it is not a viable vehicle for what is needed (unless, as I outlined above a ‘freedom party/tea party’ initiative can succeed in taking over the party from within by 2016).


91 posted on 07/12/2013 10:13:56 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

It’s been said before, but unfortunately it’s worth saying again: Boener is a bonehead.


92 posted on 07/12/2013 10:22:30 AM PDT by swampthang77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; onyx; All
” DEAF, DUMB, SELL-OUT, PANDERING TRAITORS!!!”

BTTT!

93 posted on 07/12/2013 10:36:01 AM PDT by RedMDer (When immigrants cannot or will not assimilate, its really just an invasion. Throw them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I’ve posted information which you dismiss and instead make suppositions about what I have done. I am not the topic, the actions of the House Republicans is. You state that “they haven’t done anything wrong yet” when the evidence is that they are conspiring to. I have shown you that evidence. The Hastert rule is window dressing, a ploy to gull the unwary and the naive.


94 posted on 07/12/2013 11:13:05 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Disappointing. At the same time, something has to be done beyond just building a fence etc.

But, this isn’t it.

They are in a tough spot because letting all them on the voter rolls could easily doom the GOP forever. But, deporting all the kids looks bad too.

I don’t know the answer. But, this just caving in isn’t the answer either.


95 posted on 07/12/2013 11:30:12 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

” I don’t know the answer.”

Simple.

Enforce the law of the 1986 amnesty.

If we had, there wouldn’t be a problem.


96 posted on 07/12/2013 12:22:42 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (K I L L T H E B I L L !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

I’m sending this info to others and working on ways for Republicans to kick these RINO groups out of the GOP.


97 posted on 07/12/2013 4:38:52 PM PDT by pulaskibush (Thou shalt tax/steal from Peter to help Paul/Pablo is not in the Bible!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
By the time a "Freedom Party" or anything like is viable, the country will already be in ruins. Don't know if anything short of a total mutiny and overthrow of the government will save us now.

God help us.......

98 posted on 07/12/2013 5:14:27 PM PDT by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush

Additional info posted here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3042039/posts?page=20#20


99 posted on 07/12/2013 5:43:45 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I fail to see then how one could A) Still support the GOP/RNC B) Rail for a NEW 3rd party (of which NO details exist), when they already exist (and have been in the trenches)

IMHO, I believe you’re mixing apples and oranges. Firstly, if the support were charitable/voluntary, I would have NO gripe/say whom they would give their $$. Secondly, ‘open travel’ does not = Citizen; no bennies (distributed BY gov’t) = no reason to LEGALLY immigrate unless one WANTS to be a Citizen. Again, open travel does NOT equal NO security/checks for those coming in (as if what we have today is ‘secure’ /s).

RE: ‘common, Western cultural baseline’. I’ll have to ask you to lay that out, I’m unfamiliar with your meaning.

RE: Abortion. That is ONE of the few areas I believe the (L) is wrong. BUT, as they espouse 95% of what I believe in, my vote goes with them (unless another candidate can sway me with more than ‘lesser of 2 evils’ B.S. or point to their record).

As for your closing statements, I wholeheartedly agree (EG: having common ground), but you’d be a minority, even here, to say forces should be joined on those basics.

Most, that I have witnessed, would rather/happily cast their lot with a party that would sell out their own base than acknowledge they may have been backing the ‘true’ opposition. It seems, to me, that the GOP has their own share of plantation workers who are too scared of Liberty themselves to ‘buck the system’ and vote for anyone other than (R).

Lastly, if this ‘new’ party were to join with some of the others out there, I would def. be one giving time/$$ all around. It’s been too many years since I held my nose to vote for ‘the next in line’ union seniority ideals; and I think the conglomerate (say to present the BEST candidate, given REAL debates and ideas) would shake the rot in the 2-party cartel to its core.


100 posted on 07/12/2013 7:09:48 PM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson