The Grim Effects of Liberals' Death-Obsession (repost)

American Thinker ^ | 7-11-2013 | Keith Riler

[servo1969]

Question: What do homeless dogs, poor babies, and the infirm elderly have in common?

Answer: Liberals want them all dead.

Static analysis, the absence of the virtue of hope, and a failure to realize that joy can exist in suffering are the hallmarks of modern liberalism -- the result of which is an inhuman and arrogant callousness.

---------

Liberals' reasons for killing animals, children, and the elderly are disturbingly similar. Each should die because of the (liberal's) expectation of the failure of each to live up to (the liberal's) standards. This cold brutality is rooted in the mistaken belief that dignity comes from a liberal. This is not the case.

And so death has become the handy liberal tool, to be used widely and withheld selectively. In fact, liberal fondness for death seems to be seriously constrained by only two factors. First, the liberal must be the one who makes the fatal decision; and second, he or she of course may not be the one who dies.

---------

When liberals have a problem, a challenge, or the blessing of a baby, increasingly their solution is to make that problem, challenge, or blessing un-exist. The mechanism for un-existence is death.

[servo1969]

[areukiddingme1]

“Each should die because of the (liberal’s) expectation of the failure of each to live up to (the liberal’s) standards.”

Just curious if this philosophy applies to their homosexual community and HIV/AIDS and the amount of money it costs to keep someone infected with HIV/AIDS alive and prolong their lives. The liberal battle cry: “kill the baby, save the deviant.”

[The Great RJ]

Obamacare will hit high risk infants very hard as admission to the NICU will be based on the death panel determining whether the child is worth the cost. Remember the 10 year old girl needing a lung transplant?...under Obamacare she would have been dead years ago if not aborted. The aged will fare no better and be denied care that could keep them living independently for years.

[AnalogReigns]

Many liberals I know are kind, well-meaning people....but simply confused on political realities. Most are like the old Herblock political cartoons I grew up published in the Washington Post: Liberal Democrats are always portrayed as intelligent enlightened souls deeply caring for the poor—Conservative Republicans are always fat greedy businessmen smoking cigars caring for no one but themselves: Basically FDR-era formed stereotypes (and Herblock cartooned for the Post for well over 50 years, and his ridiculous Great Depression/Democrat stereotypes always, Always, ALWAYS remained the same).
I’m utterly convinced though, behind the well-meaning liberals I know, is a really sick, evil, anti-liberty “progressive” and actually fascist ideology, with a seriously dictatorial agenda...which they are just completely oblivious to.
Unfortunately, I also believe that if/when the Democrats get the dictatorship that they desire—my gentle kind liberal friends will continue to blindly support it—and keep telling themselves that it is “freedom.”

[okie01]

I also believe that if/when the Democrats get the dictatorship that they desire—my gentle kind liberal friends will continue to blindly support it—and keep telling themselves that it is “freedom.”

Inside every liberal is a totalitarian struggling to get out.

This is a perfectly natural construction. After all, every liberal knows better than you how you should live your life. And, since you won't willingly comply to their standards, you must be compelled to do so.

If you don't understand that doing what you're told (by a liberal) is the correct construct of "freedom", you are merely revealing your abject ignorance of their superiority.