Posted on 07/11/2013 3:15:19 AM PDT by Biggirl
(CNN) -- The George Zimmerman investigation was hijacked "in a number of ways" by outside forces, said the former police chief of Sanford, Florida.
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
CNN article...no bias there...</sarc>
Comments are a good read, though.
TM’s family met in the MAYOR’S office to hear the tape?
How UNUSUAL is that???
It is often said that we are a nation of laws, not of man. Who in this country thinks that is still true? Our legal system seems to hold so much corruption.
Yes, a CNN article, but my skepticism meter hardly budged. I thought they gave an honest man his say.
And contrast that with the way the prosecutors treated Robert Zimmerman Sr.
He was brought in, put in a room all by himself, put under oath to identify the scream -- and still they discarded his sworn identification in favor of Sybrina's perjured one.
I agree he got his say but it was surrounded by CNN bias while trying to convict GZ by countering the chief’s every point. I’ll agree it wasn’t as egregious as some other examples but it was still present and the agenda was still obvious, to me at least. YMMV...
Folks in Florida should file charges against the represenatives who allowed this and caved to mob mentality.. This is not a trial it is a lynching attempt..I realise folks can vote them out, but what they have done is fraud..
Why didn’t OM or W bring that up.
No law enforcement or documenting of the Martin hoe-down in the office but Zs dad takes an oath, listens alone in a confined space,Un’fn believable
It reminds me of 50’s cowboy flick lynchings.
String em up,done deal.
All the guys hoot and holler and all the women bow there heads in shame for being associated with those men.
Hopefully the jury will be those women at the lynching
They did make the point by putting RZsr on the stand — and I’m sure that wasn’t lost on the jury — the way he was treated versus the Martin family.
hope so is todays thread up?
Problem is, that it wasn't Martin's voice on the recording...it was Zimmerman's as Martin was pummeling his head against the sidewalk.
Chief Lee told them that was wrong. Chief Lee told them he had no reason to charge Zimmerman. That was not the answer Obamagabe, Holder, Sharpton and Jackson wanted to hear. Then he was fired and replaced..........of course..........by a black police chief. Appointed by a black city manager who had just been hired. All this stinks to high heaven but since Holder calls the shots absolutely nothing will be done about it. Holder also has instigated the riots. FACT.
Comments are an excellent read.
Espscially the one that went:
“The KKK has taken over this board”
Reply: Naw, there aren’t enough Democrats posting.
Made my day!
America is NO LONGER a nation of laws of the people, by the people and for the people. America is a bunch of laws, that are made by liberal, communist, socialist judges, with agendas, and by politicians of the same ilk. They ignore the true law of the founders, and make it up as they go. In this age, if you are charged with anything, your chances of getting off are 50-50. Being innocent of the charges has nothing to do with it. The old, the government has to prove the charges against you and you do not have to prove you are not guilty, no longer apply. Now, you HAVE to prove you did not do it. It is on you to prove your innocent. If they want you guilty, the entire system will push to make you guilty, whether you are or not. If they want to get you, the gloves come off. They will make up evidence, lie, cheat, steal, do whatever to prove you guilty.
And I am wondering what this “law enforcement” group is doing to protect the citizens?
Finding Hotel deals for the out of area rioters?
I caught a glimpse of the kangaroo trial this morning and was appalled at that “judge”. People in FL surely make poor selections.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.