[absolootezer0]

In public schools only the hot young female teachers enjoy special private health classes with young teenage male students

ever watch the threads about female teachers who abuse boys, and the subsequent comments of "guilty!" or "not guilty!"

there's always the indignant females that get on and try to chastise us for those comments, but if you follow outcomes, we probably between 95-99% accurate- the "not guilty" teachers barely get a slap on the wrist. it's not us guys being sexist, we're being realists.

[ArrogantBustard]

So ... do you think it’s OK for your wife to be “going down” on 13 year old boys at the local middle school?

[metmom]

ever watch the threads about female teachers who abuse boys, and the subsequent comments of "guilty!" or "not guilty!"

there's always the indignant females that get on and try to chastise us for those comments, but if you follow outcomes, we probably between 95-99% accurate- the "not guilty" teachers barely get a slap on the wrist. it's not us guys being sexist, we're being realists.

Nobody is denying that the good looking females teachers get a pass on this. Our contention is that it IS sexist and the epitome of hypocrisy to destroy a male teachers life over the same thing a female teacher gets a pass at because *boys will be boys* and she was *hot*, and *where was she when I was a teen*.

What's wrong for the male teacher/female student is also wrong for the female teacher and male student.

Immorality is immorality and abuse of power is abuse of power. Both are wrong and both should be treated the same.