Posted on 06/29/2013 8:36:24 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
After reports that President Obama called Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to congratulate him on the passage of the immigration reform bill in the Senate – Rubio did not answer the call – former Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) blasted Rubio:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
You might want to rethink that...
Libertarian Party applauds DOMA strikedown
The Constitution Party is led by morons with no cojones...
Sarah may seem like a lone voice because the Tea Party is not a party at all. It is a movement lesser people have tried to copy.
If Sarah really put out the call in a time of OBAMA-PERIL half the country would assemble very quickly. The crass politicians in the political parties would shake in their boots if she trained her political firepower on them.
I think he’s a fellow traveler and always has been, like the Bushes, which is how he rose in FL the way he did.
Such assets, once in the GOP tend to stay there—unless they’ve totally worn out their welcome before their ambitions are satisfied.
You would think that the Liberal Media would blast this all over the news because they love anything that looks like in-fighting. Curious. If the MSM covered this, that would call Rubio into question to LIV’s.
At least Marco RINiO outed himself early.
PORK that comes from YOUR wallet, and could cost you your JOB...AMNESTY! $1.5 BILLION for youth programs...what about OUR OWN YOUTH?
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/27/Immigration-Bill-Riddled-With-Pork
The difference at any rate is the leadership in those other parties is unknown outside of a few loyalists. Palin not only has name recognition but her positions are pretty well articulated now after years of exposure.
be sure to copy and email to your friends please and CALL DC MONDAY MORNING, BURN THOSE PHONE LINES UP!
THOSE WHO DON’T KEEP PROMISES TO THE MILITARY, WON’T KEEP THEM TO U!
Has RINO-RUBIO responded to Sarah’s accurate portrayal of his treason?
The Obama White House believes their IRS buddies put the Tea Party out of business by restricting their fundraising capabilities.
Everytime I think about the lawsuits the Tea Party groups have brought against the IRS, I get angry. The only remedy is overturning the last election. Monetary compensation doesn’t cut it for me, and I’m sure it doesn’t for the Tea Party groups either.
Just too pointed. Palin just slapped Rubio right in the face. The guts are still strong with this one. Amazing.
Right On,Sarah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
which only means he can do even more damage
Palin’s criticism of Rubio would carry much more weight if she herself hadn’t embraced amnesty for illegals as McCain’s running mate. Rubio isn’t the only one who talks out of both sides of his mouth.
I’d suggest you (re)read the platform yourself. If you’re relying upon 3rd party, you’ve info is off. Open borders != amnesty
Lastly, abortion is the one of thew areas I think they are wrong.
At least, IMHO, the (L) would either enforce the Law or have it removed; amnesty would be a non-starter.
Come on, as the vp pick, she had to support WHO HAD PICKED HER, wouldnt have made a lick of sense to be giving an opposition message to the presidential candidate, would it??
I’m with them (L) there...gov’t has no business defining anything in an area they have no Right (marriage is strictly a religious institution) “Congress shall make NO law...”
I’m posted in another thread re: Const. Party. When you purport to be based on the Constitution, and some of your reasons for the party platform word count is greater than the 1440 in the Constitution, I’d think you lost the focus.
Bad enough we had recently gone from Fascism to an judicial Oligarchy; that case just invalidated the true wishes of the electorate of CA by 5 unelected judges.
Exactly, what is the GOP (or this new S.Palin party) going to do about that? It was the GOP who passed the Patriot Act (quite the misnomer), giving us the FISA/NSA/TSA/etc. You have one of the ‘top dogs’ Graham who’s quite happy the 4th is dead. Sorry, I can’t even begin to include myself in that group with that track record.
The point is, if the candidate compromises his or her position once out of expediency, he’ll do it again when push comes to shove. Most of the people in the Senate who now back amnesty talked tough on the issue while candidates or as private citizens, and look at them now. Even McCain once promised to get tough on border enforcement! There’s nothing to suggest that Palin would be any different, since we know that she’s already toed the establishment line on immigration once.
You might be right. I’d be more than willing to throw my hat in after I read what the platform consists.
Though, I would still give her a wary eye, knowing she did not stand up for herself re: McCain/Romney. We already have someone who can make flowery speeches, I want to see ACTION.
Ek, you explain what she was suppose to do once on the ticket??? And you discount all her current points of view now, where she is against the current policy????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.