Sarah in 2016, Piper in 2036!!!
Posted on 06/28/2013 6:20:50 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
LOL, Dan Quayle? That is your attack?
Anyone who thinks that Dan Quayle was ever a Governor Palin, the boldest most effective conservative leader since Reagan, is not playing with a full deck.
Oh, I just checked you home page “”Libertarian on many social issues.””
Gotcha, a social liberal still angry at social conservatism, Quayle and Murphy Brown and so on, I see your discomfort now, it’s the whole anti-conservative thing.
Hey, don't include me in that list!! :) I have never used Reagan to go after Palin. I respect and admire them both!!!
without a doubt. She has been waging a full time war on the evil left and the arrogant GOP-e.
Absolutely no one on the scene today has the charisma and raw intelligence of Sarah.
Sarah is the one that traitors like Rove, the Bushes, the rest of the RINOs fear the most.
Not my attack. McCain GOPe staff followed by the media. It worked on Quayle. It worked on Palin too. Conservatives and some libertarians will vote for her.
If she's the GOP nominee, I'll vote for her in the general election.
However, she's been smeared to such a degree that most independents won't vote for her. If Hillary is the Dimwits' nominee, expect the female vote to go 2:1 for Hillary if she goes head to head with Palin.
Quayle knew he was toast and didn't hang on long-term for another try at national office.
That being said, I doubt Palin will run. Bet Roger Ailes got assurances on that front before she was able to return to Fox News.
In the unlikely event Palin does run and becomes the GOP nominee, I'll vote for her in the general election.
I didn’t intend to include you by any means, but I see what you mean, by pinging two names and me saying “you guys” it looked liked I was including you, sorry about that appearance.
They know without Palin there would never be (another) President Bush
Your going back to minor, nondescript political figures of the distant past to find Dan Quayle and trying to fit him into something relevant to the tea party, and the Palin led conservative movement and her displayed political power as she has involved herself in over a 100 political races, decades later, and to an historical, Reagan like figure of Governor Palin, just doesn’t compute.
Quayle was a Dan Quayle, not a political giant and national leader with the charisma and voice and effect of the Governor, who still dominates GOP politics as the 2012 presidential candidate fades into, well, Dan Quayle status.
The problem with her is the fact that she would probably be a fantastic president. No one seems to want that.
Ridiculous. That ticket is a dead loser.
In the end they sure did beat Romney, for example, the third or second place guy does not become the presidential candidate, write that down.
McCain couldn't beat Obama in an election that republicans could not win, and 4 years later, Romney could not beat Obama, in an election that republicans could not lose.
Do you also believe that McIdiot was ineligible to run in 2008 because he was born in Panama?
What about George Romney's 1968 presidential bid? Was he ineligible because he was born in Mexico?
......”but she is not going to be elected”......and “she’s been Borked”...............
with respect sir, I think you are wrong BECAUSE:....any REAL conservative we put forward (”we” being us conservatives) is going to be, as you say, “Borked”. The left will attack such a person viciously, no matter WHO they are!!
Sarah survived the bastards attacks even though these attacks were far more vicious than anything else known in 200 plus years of American Electoral Politics. I personally believe many good conservatives on our side, observing what happened to the Palins and Gabby Gifford, simply do not have the courage to run for President out of fear of the LEFT’s Attack Machine! Exactly what the left wants!
Now, the left’s strategy works with millions of people that think like you obviously do. They (the left and their media allies) have a large segment of “us” Conservatives ALWAYS wanting a RINO so that the left will APPROVE of our candidate and then “be nice” to us during the election.
Exactly the opposite is needed, the RINO strategy is a demonstrable failure. It has failed all the way back to G.H.W.B. (our first Rino). I admire G.H.W.B. for a lot of reasons but think his Presidency was not so good as he was, in the end, a taxer and a spender as was his offspring. From both the bush’s, all we got was more taxes and profligate spending of borrowed money.
I say Cruz/Palin or Palin/Cruz is my dream ticket! Whatever chance pretty boy Rubio had is gone forever and any talk about a Bush is just maniacal.
Sarah in 2016, Piper in 2036!!!
good analysis although I wish she would run
I will never vote for somebody with the last name of Bush again. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me three times, I need to start hitting the alcohol and just avoid elections all together.
WHAT! Bush! Jeb Bush! Rino left of his brother Bush? What are they thinking? I believe they are getting their orders fron the White House—Who could they pick that could lose to a Hillary or a Michele Obama (or 3rd Term Obama) Who would be worst than Mittens? How abou a David Duke/ Mark Rubio Ticket? or lets drag out Ron Paul Maybe McCain would like another shot? 1st—Sarah Palin would NEVER agree to such a mis-match, nor should she. 2rd There must be better—Sober up Perry and he would be good—Heck even Donald Trump could be better—and he would make a TV show out of the whole thing and make money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.