Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
"and oppose the conservative one?"

Allowing the government power of who gets married to whom?

If that is your definition of a Conservative position then yes I am against it.

See it isn't in the Constitution so the FedGov has no business involved in it.

Please at least learn that!

93 posted on 06/26/2013 5:58:13 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg

You disagree with this?

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.


98 posted on 06/26/2013 6:07:10 PM PDT by ansel12 (Libertarians, Gays = in all marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson