To: Mad Dawgg
You disagree with this?
Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.
98 posted on
06/26/2013 6:07:10 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Libertarians, Gays = in all marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.)
To: ansel12
"Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships." Is any of the above relegated to the Fedgov by the Constitution or the Amendments?
99 posted on
06/26/2013 6:10:28 PM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: Mad Dawgg
You do agree with the libertarian position, that is why you won’t answer.
Libertarians never do respond to the libertarian position, they flinch like vampires and refuse to respond.
108 posted on
06/26/2013 6:33:15 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Libertarians, Gays = in all marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.)
To: ansel12
If these libertarians are going to vomit all over FR like this, I’m going to have to take a long break.
121 posted on
06/26/2013 8:17:16 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson