[1rudeboy]

[Justice] Kagan said the majority "threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. I would not embark on so unwise an adventure."

[Still Thinking]

"threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. I would not embark on so unwise an adventure."

I bet you wouldn't, ho. Note how trouble and anguish imposed upon inanimate regulations is considered a drawback, but burying real people (the ones with jobs, not the governmental parasites) under mountains of regulation isn't problematic.

[Ray76]

Kagan should not be on ANY court.

[BJ1]

[Justice] Kagan said the majority "threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. I would not embark on so unwise an adventure."

What is she so afraid of? I mean the vast array of land-use that she speaks of is all constitutional? right?

[Carry_Okie]

[Justice] Kagan said the majority "threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. I would not embark on so unwise an adventure."

Justice Kagan moronically presumes that "no use" is good for the land and that the almighty bureaucracy is serious about environmental productivity. Neither is true.

[Standing Wolf]

[Justice] Kagan said the majority "threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. I would not embark on so unwise an adventure."

Heaven forbid regulators should ever suffer constitutional scrutiny!

[ScottinVA]

Oh, how could we... subject a fast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny?

Good God, the horror of applying the CONSTITUTION!

Somebody.. something.. take those creatures back to where they came from.

[manc]

Kagen , from Harvard and the far left kook wing to the SCOTUS, you can’t even make it up.

All this is , is a plant in the court to let Obama know what is going on

[SilverMine]

Kagan said the majority "threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny. I would not embark on so unwise an adventure."

Kagan needs to put aside her copy of Agenda 21 and try reading the US Constitution for once.

[1010RD]

We don’t need no steenken heightened Constitutional scrutiny!

[rfp1234]

threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny.

Oh no, those poor regs are being abused! Mass protests are being organized by PETARD (People for the Ethical Treatment of Aggressive Regulatory Documents).