Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rule for Florida property owner in land use case
Reuters ^ | Jonathan Stempel and Lawrence Hurley

Posted on 06/25/2013 10:39:18 AM PDT by fifedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: LibertarianLiz
Considering the ongoing attack on property rights by the EPA; Yes!, this is news.

The EPA is nothing but a front for the UN Agenda 21.

21 posted on 06/25/2013 12:16:42 PM PDT by SilverMine (ever member of congress should be horse whipped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

Zactly!


22 posted on 06/25/2013 12:42:18 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

We don’t need no steenken heightened Constitutional scrutiny!


23 posted on 06/25/2013 1:09:10 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The Senate Republicans, a/k/a the saviors of the Nation, disagree with your opinion. I happen to agree with you, but that is just me.


24 posted on 06/25/2013 1:13:32 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fifedom

“Pray every night for the health of Justices Thomas, Alito, Scalia, Roberts, and Kennedy”

and YTF should Roberts be included?? That POS is the reason why we now have Odumbocare.


25 posted on 06/25/2013 1:40:20 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
threatens to subject a vast array of land-use regulations, applied daily in states and localities throughout the country, to heightened constitutional scrutiny.

Oh no, those poor regs are being abused! Mass protests are being organized by PETARD (People for the Ethical Treatment of Aggressive Regulatory Documents).

26 posted on 06/25/2013 1:46:41 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

Let’s hoist em by it!


27 posted on 06/25/2013 3:22:38 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: max americana
and YTF should Roberts be included

Because that would mean "Chief Justice Ginsburg" and "Associate Justice Cass Sunstein".

28 posted on 06/25/2013 3:25:29 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Arguing with a marxist is like playing Chess with a Pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: max americana
"and YTF should Roberts be included?? That POS is the reason why we now have Odumbocare."

Because we need him on cases like this. Someone who is on my side a majority of the time is my friend.

If Roberts resigns from the court he will be replaced by someone like Kagan and Sotomayor. Would you rather have them?
29 posted on 06/25/2013 4:31:33 PM PDT by fifedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson