Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Young People Should Say No to Obamacare: The program needs them, but itís not worth signing on.
National Review ^ | 06/21/2013 | John Fund

Posted on 06/21/2013 5:48:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Starting in 2014, Obamacare will attempt to get almost every American to obtain health insurance. The system desperately needs healthy young people, millions of whom don’t have health insurance, to sign up because their money is needed to subsidize treatment for older, sicker Americans. But will they?

Young people will be asked to buy policies that don’t reflect the low risk they have of getting sick. Obamacare allows health insurers to vary premiums based on age, but they can charge older customers only up to three times as much as healthy young customers, while most insurers have as much as a five- or six-to-one ratio. This means lower prices for older (and wealthier) folks, but high prices for the young. “They’ll have sticker shock,” House budget chairman Paul Ryan told me.

Indeed, the law will require four out of five young Americans to pay more than they otherwise would for health coverage — yet another form of generational theft from young to old that ought to sour young people on government “help.”

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office, has found that less than half of those under 30 will sign up for Obamacare coverage on the exchanges if their premiums rise by 30 percent. Those kinds of increases for private policies are already routinely showing up in states preparing for Obamacare. Even if premiums don’t rise dramatically, the process of signing up for health insurance has become dramatically complicated. The online application that has become the standard for everyone seeking Obamacare subsidies for coverage runs to more than 60 pages’ worth of questions, demanding information on income, family status, details on any health insurance offered at an applicant’s workplace, and lifestyle.

Ezekiel Emanuel, a physician who is brother to former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, has spent a lot of time gaming out how Obamacare will work. He frets that young people will be “bewildered,” and they may “forgo purchasing insurance and opt to pay a penalty instead.” Indeed, the penalty starts at just $95 a year, and, though it will automatically rise some, Democrats will be loath to propose increasing it to an effective level.

And whether they are slackers, students, or software engineers, young people are smart enough to figure out that they can easily wait to sign up for coverage until after they get sick. Obamacare requires every insurance company to take anyone on as a customer regardless of any pre-existing conditions.

If young people boycott Obamacare, the law of adverse selection kicks in. Too few young people in an insurance pool means fewer healthy people to subsidize the sicker people. Costs and premiums will rise more than expected, which will lead to fewer young people signing up and costs going up even more. In insurance jargon, it’s called a death spiral.

Grace-Marie Turner, head of the free-market Galen Institute, has looked at a typical young person’s decision tree on Obamacare. If someone is 27 years old, single, and making $34,000 a year, he will have to fork over more than $300 a month for a basic health-care package — that’s 50 percent more than he is likely paying now. Obamacare would send him a check for $20 a month through its subsidy program, but he or she will still wind up paying some $1,000 a year of after-tax income for basic health insurance. That’s a lot for someone with a decent job who is trying to save money for a house or to start a family.

No wonder Health and Human Services secretary Kathleen Sebelius got caught visiting with companies she regulates to try to shake them down for contributions to promote signing up for Obamacare (what the federal government calls “educational” efforts). The legally dubious slush-fund strong-arming is a sign of desperation. With young people’s support for Obamacare at or below 40 percent in many polls, the likelihood of the exchanges’ experiencing “market failure” is high. If that happens, the whole rotten edifice of Obamacare will be exposed.

When it comes to the drug of government-run health care, my advice to young people is the same as that offered by Nancy and Ronald Reagan about illegal drugs over 30 years ago: “Just Say No.” Both products may create the short-term illusion of well-being, but it doesn’t last, and the long-term complications are devastating.

— John Fund is national-affairs columnist for National Review Online.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhohealthcare; generationy; johnfund; obamacare; youth; youthvote

1 posted on 06/21/2013 5:48:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 06/21/2013 5:49:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Here's an overwhelming reason they won't sign up; student loan and credit card debt.

Which is why Ubama must have the US taxpayer eat outstanding student loans.

3 posted on 06/21/2013 5:52:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All of this is disaster without TORT REFORM!


4 posted on 06/21/2013 5:59:05 AM PDT by HChampagne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

LOVE! that picture. I had a good laugh out loud at the expense of those fools..


5 posted on 06/21/2013 6:05:10 AM PDT by clarissaexplainsitall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No student loan, no credit card debt here.

Also not paying for Obamacare. Obama’s welcome to penalize me for 95/year, but thanks to the atty general here - it’s unenforceable.


6 posted on 06/21/2013 6:13:39 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Un Pere, Une Mere, C'est elementaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: clarissaexplainsitall

Young people who do NOT join the bandwagon of Odumbocare will suffer the fate of the IRS. “Payup or else!”


7 posted on 06/21/2013 6:14:43 AM PDT by DaveA37 (I'm for SMALLER , HONEST government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The online application that has become the standard for everyone seeking Obamacare subsidies for coverage runs to more than 60 pages’ worth of questions, demanding information on income, family status, details on any health insurance offered at an applicant’s workplace, and lifestyle.

I'm not 27 .... and I'm not sure what I'm going to do, but it won't be Obamacare.

8 posted on 06/21/2013 6:29:12 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If someone is 27 years old, single, and making $34,000 a year, he will have to fork over more than $300 a month for a basic health-care package — that’s 50 percent more than he is likely paying now. Obamacare would send him a check for $20 a month through its subsidy program, but he or she will still wind up paying some $1,000 a year of after-tax income for basic health insurance.

Maybe I'm one of those "old math" geezers, but if they pay $300/month, that's $3600 a year. Even with a subsidy of $20/month ($240), it's still $3360/year, not $1000. Am I missing something?
9 posted on 06/21/2013 6:32:02 AM PDT by chrisser (Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I love this short, simple article. Pay $95 or well over a thousand for a young low wage worker? I’m going to put this on my waiting room.
The other thing the article does not state is that there will still be co-pays and deductibles further increasing out of pocket costs.
Most low wage workers w/o insurance will not fall for the BS.


10 posted on 06/21/2013 6:42:25 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“lofos”


11 posted on 06/21/2013 6:57:18 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If young people boycott Obamacare, the law of adverse selection kicks in. Too few young people in an insurance pool means fewer healthy people to subsidize the sicker people. Costs and premiums will rise more than expected, which will lead to fewer young people signing up and costs going up even more. In insurance jargon, it’s called a death spiral.

All of which gets us closer to nobama's ultimate goal: Single Payer.

12 posted on 06/21/2013 7:02:32 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They can’t pay their student loans. They certainly are not going to sign up for Obamacare. Millions of people are just not going to bother with it.


13 posted on 06/21/2013 7:17:23 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So there will be a budget shortfall? No problem, McCain and Graham to the rescue.


14 posted on 06/21/2013 7:27:01 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

Probably taking into account that the premiums are tax deductible so that lowers out of pocket.


15 posted on 06/21/2013 7:41:38 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Being of the generation that was subject to the draft, I wonder how long it will be before it is reinstated as a way to put younger people into the system. I hope it isn’t so but I recall how unfair it was to those families without the means to avoid going.


16 posted on 06/21/2013 7:50:41 AM PDT by whodathunkit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

I did the same calculation and got the same answer you did.

Numbers in article don’t seem to add up.


17 posted on 06/21/2013 8:20:33 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not sure why it is just the young that will opt for the penalty. Why not old people too?


18 posted on 06/21/2013 8:23:49 AM PDT by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

To the young people that voted for Obama but don’t want to pay the premiums for Obamacare:

What the heck did you expect? This IS the socialism you voted for!


19 posted on 06/21/2013 1:05:01 PM PDT by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh
I love this short, simple article. Pay $95 or well over a thousand for a young low wage worker? I’m going to put this on my waiting room. The other thing the article does not state is that there will still be co-pays and deductibles further increasing out of pocket costs. Most low wage workers w/o insurance will not fall for the BS.

And those co-pays are costly. $45 for a doctor visit. $50 for a generic prescription. If you want a name-brand, you have to meet a $500 deductible first.

This is NOT the coverage people thought they were getting.
20 posted on 06/21/2013 1:06:46 PM PDT by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Probably taking into account that the premiums are tax deductible so that lowers out of pocket.

Are they going to be? Hubby and I were trying to figure that out. His premiums from his job are taken out pre-tax, so they should be tax-deductible for someone not getting insurance through an employer. But where is that done? I figure on Schedule A, under medical expenses, but you have to be paying a large percentage (which went up under Obamacare) of your income before you can even deduct medical expenses.
21 posted on 06/21/2013 1:09:11 PM PDT by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yorkiemom
Not sure why it is just the young that will opt for the penalty. Why not old people too?

Because no matter your age, your premium (and subsidy) is based on income only. An older person's total premium will be much higher than the younger person. Plus I imagine us older folks would rather be insured than not, since more can go wrong or we're already on some kind of treatment/medication for something or other.
22 posted on 06/21/2013 1:12:06 PM PDT by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson