Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Monsanto Executive Is Among World Food Prize Winners
The New York Times ^ | June 19, 2013 | ANDREW POLLACK

Posted on 06/19/2013 4:41:28 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: opentalk
They paid $5,000,000 for an $83,333 return? Even you must get a better return on your investments.

As for propping up the food industry, I think they'll do okay without the $5,000,000.

61 posted on 07/01/2013 3:05:20 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Oh please.

World Food Prize is an Iowa State University thing started by Norman Borlaug and trucking magnate John Ruan.

Heck, they spent $30 million just renovating the old Des Moines Public Library building to move WFP organization from the ISU campus. Most of it got spent on bad art.

It’s no different from Hollywood funding Academy Awards or any other industry group handing out awards in their industry.


62 posted on 07/01/2013 3:14:09 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
Now I’m off to see what my gmo free, heirloom seeded, chemical-free, composted, natural weed barriered, rain watered garden has for today’s lunch and supper! It’s great not relying on Monsanto practices and chemicals to feed my family of four, soon to be five, practically all year even in zone 6b.

All that is well and good, and I encourage everyone who can and want to, to do the same.

But even you know that you're not in the business of feeding others, only your own family. Try feeding 150 other people, and then get back to us.

Those who feed the others as a livelyhood could not possibly do so using your methods, no matter how much they were paid. The worlds population would need to be thinned, through starvation or some other method.

I'm a champion of Monsanto, and the hundreds of other like companies, even though my only connection with them has been using their products to provide food for others.

63 posted on 07/01/2013 3:26:39 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (When America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Choice of Monsanto Betrays WorldFood Prize Purpose, SayGlobal Leaders

"This statement is supported by 81 Councillors of the World Future Council,

… The choice of the 2013 World Food Prize is an affront to the growing international consensus on safe, ecological farming practices that have been scientifically proven to promote nutrition and sustainability. Many governments have rejected GMOs, and as many as two million citizens in 52 countries recently marched in oppositionto GMOs and Monsanto. In living democracies, discounting this knowledge and these many voices is not acceptable.

… While profitable to the few companies producing them, GMO seeds reinforce a model of farming that undermines sustainability of cash-poor farmers, who make up most of the world'shungry. GMO seeds continuefarmers' dependency on purchased seed and chemical inputs. The most dramaticimpact of such dependency isinIndia, where 270,000 farmers, many trapped indebt for buying seedsand chemicals, committed suicide between1995 and 2012.

64 posted on 07/08/2013 9:29:44 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: opentalk; Balding_Eagle
This statement is supported by 81 Councillors of the World Future Council,

LOL! More like the World Past Council.

as many as two million citizens in 52 countries recently marched in opposition to GMOs and Monsanto.

As many as 6 billion citizens did not march.

GMO seeds reinforce a model of farming that undermines sustainability of cash-poor farmers, who make up most of the world's hungry.

It's true, higher yield farming makes it tough for low yield farming.

GMO seeds continue farmers' dependency on purchased seed and chemical inputs.

It's a good thing the higher yields pay for the higher costs.

The most dramatic impact of such dependency is in India, where 270,000 farmers, many trapped in debt for buying seeds and chemicals, committed suicide between 1995 and 2012.

I heard it was 270,000,000.

65 posted on 07/08/2013 3:15:32 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; opentalk

Hehe! Thanks.

“I heard it was 270,000,000” Chuckle.


66 posted on 07/08/2013 4:04:08 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (When America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
While profitable to the few companies producing them

Few?

Every successful seed company in the world is either producing them, or has sucontracted out to have them produced for them.

67 posted on 07/08/2013 4:16:29 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (When America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
No farmer ever bought seeds, bought chemicals or borrowed money until GMOs.

Do these clowns realize how silly they sound?

68 posted on 07/08/2013 6:41:14 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson