He acted like he didn't know the words, because he didn'tknow the words. What an utter, ignorant fool this General is. An asinine, moronic buffoon. A skulking poltroon. All the interviewer had to do was stop the interview right then and there, and go to the trouble of actually quoting the Fourth Amendment.
God save us from such imbeciles as this supposed expert.
The General is not stupid and he is not ignorant. He knows what the Constitution says and he knows what it means. He doesn't care. He is playing a lawyer's word game to sell tyranny. There are a lot of people that buy into it.
I wish the questioner had inserted a parenthesis to ask the general if the 4th Amendment actually contained “probable cause”, would he feel compelled to follow such a requirement, since he had repeatedly sworn his allegiance to the Constitution in his oaths of office.
HF
Looks like a revenge of the nerds quality twerp.
The greater concern is in the anger and arrogance and contempt he displayed when challenged. He looks so bad...