Muslim Inbreeding: Impacts on Intelligence, Sanity, Health and Society

RightSideNews ^ | 8 11 2010 | Nicolai Sennels

[LyinLibs]

86% of moslems are gay.

[Rummyfan]

No signs of inbreeding here...

[edwinland]

Ha ha! And 93.2% of statistics are made up.

[Dick Bachert]

The MOST important statistic is that most of them (READY?)
W.A.N.T. U.S. D.E.A.D.

There, is that clear?

[jiggyboy]

They self-select for sociopathy as well. “Moderate” Muslims are far more likely to be judged to be blasphemous &c and dealt with in the usual ways.

[dagogo redux]

Hence the preference for the AK-47. Not that there’s anything wrong with an AK . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vpuh6q2O_c

[miserare]

They do all look alike, don’t they?

(OK...throw a shoe at me.)

[Valpal1]

The Muslim culture has been inbreeding for more total years than any Egyptian dynasty, which all failed and disappeared before Muslims came on the scene.

The problem with Muslim religion is they’ve taken this unfortunate feature of tribal culture and dialed it up to 11 by giving it the stamp of religious approval.

So any common sense calls to stop the practice are going to run into the brick wall of “Mohammed says”.

[KarlInOhio]

The Moslems only date back to the 6/700s
the Egyptians were around at the time of Moses...
does this author mean the Arabs instead ???

He's talking about individual Egyptian dynasties. The count incremented whenever they had a change in ruling family or a period of anarchy. Wikipedia lists 31 dynasties between 3100 BC and 332 BC.

I don't know whether there was any significant inbreeding in the common Egyptian populous as there was in the royalty.

[Slings and Arrows]

Yay! Another chance to post about Carlos II of Spain!

* * *

Getting back on topic, if we're looking for a royal personage who was a victim of inbreeding depression the clearest candidate is Carlos II (1661-1700), the last Habsburg king of Spain. Most history books will tell you his deficiencies were the result of excessive inbreeding, but let's look at the evidence for ourselves.

How inbred was he?

That Carlos was the product of inbreeding is undeniable. Since the days of his ancestor Charles V (1500-1558, aka Carlos I of Spain), the Habsburgs had been in the habit of marrying members of the family's Spanish branch to members of the Austrian branch. Oh yeah, in their heyday the Habsburgs controlled not only the Spanish and Austrian Empires but also the low countries (Benelux), Portugal, southern Italy (Naples and Sicily), Milan and Burgundy.

Have a look at Carlos II's family tree. His mother and father were niece and uncle. Granted, this was sort of an accident of history given that this was Philip IV's second marriage, and it just so happened that none of the sons of his first wife, Elisabeth of Bourbon, lived long enough to accede to the throne.



A couple of other fun facts indicative of Carlos' pedigree collapse:

(1) Carlos was descended from his great great great grandparents Juana la Loca (1479-1555) and Philip the Handsome (1478-1506, Felipe el Hermoso) through three of their children.

(2) whereas someone whose ascendants (i.e. direct ancestors) were all unrelated to their spouses would have 32 great great great grandparents, Carlos only had 14.

How messed up was he?

Carlos' physical and mental deficiencies earned him the nickname "El Hechizado" (The Hexed). First off, there was his debilitating overbite. Prominent chins ran in the Habsburg family (check out the portraits of Charles V or of Carlos' father Philip IV), but with Carlos II the condition was so bad that he had problems chewing. It's also said that it was difficult to understand Carlos when he spoke and that he frequently drooled. To me this seems analogous to those overly purebred Persian cats whose faces are so flat that they have respiratory problems and their tear ducts get blocked up.

This, however, was the least of Carlos' problems. He was feeble and sickly, prone to high fevers which kept him confined to his bed. It's also said that he suffered from seizures, that he invariably vomited on carriage rides due to chronic motion sickness, and that his eyes oozed liquid in open air. In addition to his physical shortcomings, Carlos II was purportedly dim-witted and he was left basically uneducated. The classic 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica claims "there was no room in his nearly imbecile mind for more than childish superstition, insane pride of birth, and an interest in court etiquette." Due to his weak health, he remained mostly idle while his mother, his bastard brother Don Juan José of Austria, and his advisors made most of the decisions affecting the Empire, with Carlos' most vigorous activity consisting of the occasional hunt.

Although he was married twice Carlos II fathered no children, and it is assumed that he was infertile if not actually impotent. His reign as king was largely disastrous and his inability to produce an heir led to the War of Spanish Succession.

Was this inbreeding depression?

As I said above, Carlos' mandibular prognasthism sounds like a heriditary physical trait which became exacerbated to the point of becoming a deformity due to inbreeding. Moreover, his sickliness and sexual dysfunction appear analogous to immunity and reproduction problems which have been documented in highly inbred lab rats. Therefore, I think it seems very likely that Carlos' problems did indeed stem from inbreeding depression.

Interestingly enough, Carlos' sister the Infanta Margarita Teresa (1651-1673, who as a little girl was the subject of Velázquez's masterpiece Las Meninas) was not affected by the same problems as him. She was lively and beautiful although, judging by her portrait, she looks like she had a strong chin. Margarita was married to the Emperor Leopold I (her uncle and first cousin) who was himself pretty inbred and had an abnormal underbite although he was otherwise fit and intelligent. They had six children (only one of whom survived to adulthood) before Margarita died at the age of 21.

Source.

[edwinland]

“The MOST important statistic is that most of them (READY?)
W.A.N.T. U.S. D.E.A.D.

There, is that clear?”

If that’s all we need to know, why post an article with reams of other statistics in it? And why, if that’s all we need to know, did someone make up an absurd statistic about Turkish reading habits. If that’s all we need to know, why are their reading habits relevant?

And how many of the other statistics listed in the article were invented because they are also not relevant? Why do people invent irrelevant and ridiculous statistics? Seems like a lot of work for nothing, if the only thing we need to know fits in a three word ALL CAPS statement.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

****The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring’s intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings ****

Anyone look at the Royals of Europe? It seems many were “bleeders” back in their day.

They were so inbred that the grandsons of Queen Victoria (King George, The Kaiser, and the Czar of Russia) went to war with each other back in 1914.

[layman]

in 2008, the Catholic Church announced that followers of Islam had surpassed the number of Catholics in the world

This statement might be correct but could be somewhat misleading .... there about 1.2 billion Muslims in the world, and about 5.3 billion non-Muslims. Another way to look at it is there are 1.2 billion Muslims and 2.2 billion Christians.

[Dick Bachert]

“Seems like a lot of work for nothing, if the only thing we need to know fits in a three word ALL CAPS statement.”

I assume you refer to your highly erudite and scholarly comment about the allegedly bogus stat re. Turks (in a document FILLED with other stats).

And a SERIOUS PEDANT would get busy and run down any other errors in the piece.

I’ll look for your reply in about a month.

[edwinland]

The “aggedly bogus” statistic was not the result of a typo, like someone meant 17% but they printed 70%.

The text of the original article was changed from something about reading habits (most people don’t read books anymore) into a general indictment of the intellectual capability of an entire country (70% of Turks have never read a single book in their life).

If the author of the article did that, then you don’t have to be a serious pedant to figure out that he is a kook, and a lying one at that. If on the other hand you made the change ...

[LibWhacker]

Sterilize the b***ards from orbit!

[Lady Jag]

They preferred inbreeding out of distrust among tribes and a book I read years ago had their average IQ at 59 (I believe in the interim US's IQs have lowered so theirs has possibly risen).

A true example of physical effects of inbreeding (You can't walk this way):

[GOPJ]

It’s called cultural suicide...

Ping.

**************************************************************

Historically, no culture has ever reversed a 1.9 fertility rate.

A rate of 1.3 is impossible to reverse, because it would take 80-100 years to correct itself.

In 2007:

The fertility rate in France was 1.8, of which the fertility rate of Muslims was 8.1 children per family. Southern France there are now more mosques than churches. Thirty percent of children age 20 and younger are Islamic. In larger cities, like Nice, that number has grown to 35%. By 2027, 1 in 5 Frenchmen will be Muslim. In 39 years, France will be an Islamic Republic.

The fertility rate in England was 1.6. In 2007 there were 3.5 million Muslims.

The fertility rate in Greece was 1.3

The fertility rate in Germany was 1.3

The fertility rate in Italy was 1.2

The fertility rate in Spain was 1.1

In Canada 1.6

In the U.S. 1.6 UNTIL the Latino influx is added, which brings us to 2.11, the number needed to barely maintain our culture – or something.

Across the entire European Union of 31 countries, the fertility rate in 2007 was 1.38. IMPOSSIBLE TO REVERSE. In a matter of years, Europe will cease to exist.

[TexasRepublic]

It appears the inbred dummies are only good at screwing and killing. They should do just fine in Washington.