Posted on 06/04/2013 9:26:09 AM PDT by servo1969
I could go with the argument of it’s my private business in the bedroom but the trouble is that they do not keep it in the bedroom.
What on earth is a parade to celebrate, flags, stickers rainbows etc?
Doesn’t make sense and that doesn’t include how some have to tell everyone they meet what they are, or they have to act in such a way that they are telling the public.
I;ve seen homosexual woman who try to act and dress like a guy but in th eend they try to hard and make fools of themselves.
Just last week I saw one woman strutting about swinging her shoulders as if she was making us all think she was a guy, then she had the Cig in her mouth hanging out and the smoking it as if she was a tough guy or something.
People all around me just started laughing so it’s not just you who is getting fed up with them too.
Now it’s teach in schools, marriage, force others to accept them , infiltrate schools, churches, military, groups and anything they think is their enemy
What’s wrong RE: ‘flat-tax’:
- Still those who would not pay into the system
- Still a slave tax and involuntary
- 3rd party payee
Sure; if you make no money you have zero income and, remembering basic math, zero times the rate would be zero-dollars.
- Still a slave tax and involuntary
By that logic any tax could be considered a slave-tax; and 'voluntary' is a scam under our government anyway as refusal to participate in a healtcare-scam is punishable by fine (called a tax).
- 3rd party payee
Who? The government?
No, there's only two people involved in a no-withholding system: the person taxed and the government.
1) Exactly why a flat-tax is wrong. Do those you site still utilize the benefits the rest pay for?
2) You’re partially correct; for those which are involuntary. EG: One does not drive = no license/plates/insurance/gas taxes. Your ‘h.care’ analogy is exactly what that is wrong as well.
3) AKA: Employer. Make the Citizen responsible for their own bills/payments. The Citizens of this US should be responsible for their own well-being first, gov’t can take a back seat to the $$ line.
So you're ignoring the "no withholdings" I put in the list?
1) Exactly why a flat-tax is wrong. Do those you site still utilize the benefits the rest pay for?
Irrelevant. To claim otherwise is to claim that the poor should not be allowed to use any public utility/place because they are not paying into its construction or upkeep; also there should never be any sort of playground in public parks, because children do not pay into the system either. — that philosophy also ignores the reality of life: even the rich may become poor [while they were rich they should have payed into the system, does their now status preclude them from using what they paid for?].
1) No, I’m saying the gov’t should be in the back of the line, not the 1st one out of the gate. The gov’t has no incentive, nor Right, to make sure Citizen does/gets/etc. XYZ. Therefore, they should no be sucking the $$ out of anyone’s hands before the Citizen is well and good on their own (or from their family/friends/church/etc.)...NOT the gov’t/taxpayers.
2) Sorry, but no. Your example is a local issue; city/county vs. taxpayers. Once it is open/payed there is no to minimal upkeep (can be done by the Citizens themselves). Hell, they can BUILD it themselves! Poor, rich, whomever can utilize those public facilities. Don’t like ‘em/etc.? Apts/schools/etc. have facilities too. Hae a yard? Built ‘em there. Gov’t isn’t needed to make sure you don’t bruise your knee.
Welcome to the club. I've been holding a spot for you. Just don't let it get you down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.