kirk is a racist and is just one cog in the machine that keeps its boot firmly on America’s neck and promotes and encourages keeping the black community firmly held in rat party enslavement... he is part of the problem and for that reason Rush is correct... as he is 98.7% of the time... verified.
LLS
In a society that treats racism (This is such an undefined and ambiguous word as to have no real meaning), correctly ( Indeed the whole idea particularly when levied against whites has been worse than being a murderer or child molester- something is really wrong with this whole Orwellian concept), as a grave offense, it shouldn’t really matter. But apparently it does.(Of course it does because it has NEVER been about fairness but about destroying the West)
Wasn’t there some AA FL politician, pulled over by a policeman, who repeatedly called the white officer, ‘boy’ for no reason other than he could?
They are bulletproof and they know it.
They are devolving to using tactics used in their motherland, the ones that has seen entire villages decimated through neanderthal behaviors.
The double standard. This has been obvious for a long time. There is no doubt over it. If you’re White, Christian, male, normalsexual, and conservative you have no recourse. Everything and anything you say or don’t say or do or don’t do is racist/sexist/homophobe/headchopperphobe/ and you can’t plead innocence.
I’m not really offended by “white boy”. I know it’s meant to imply we don’t know what it’s like and have certain mentality, but I’m still not offended.
But then, I don’t have really thin skin, as apparently dark skin does.
Of course a black man knows how to fix the problem. It worked so well in Detroit. And Zimbabwe is a paradise after removing the elitist honkys from power.
Hey Bobby - Why is the South Side so f’ed up compared to Highland Park, IL?
Okay, Mr. Rush, I guess that would mean you do know something about it so what is your solution?
And if you have the solution, why haven't you implemented it?
After all, Chicago hasn't exactly been under the governing thumb of white boys like Mark Kirk these past few decades has it?
without knowing whether the epithet came from the white politician or the black politician.
Or without knowing the parties of each politician.
I have a friend I worked with. As a teen back in the early 1960s he was stopped by Chicago cops for some infraction.
He mouthed off, so they took him way out into the country, and back in a corn field they beat the coon dog s#!t out of him and left him there! He learned his lesson.
But then, he was white. So were the cops.
It is a simple fact that locking up all unemployed black males from the ages of 18-45 would drop the crime rate precipitously. It would also be unconstitutional. And unworkable. But facts are facts...young black males commit the overwhelming majority of violent and non-violent crimes in any metro area where they reside. Calling someone a racist for pointing out the ugly and unfortunate truth does not change the facts.
Some entrepreneur could make a fortune overnight, creating a simple electronic device, of a small box with a red button on it and a speaker on its side.
Inside it is a timer. The first time you push the button, it says a word. If you push the button again within a few seconds, it says the word louder, if you keep pushing it, it says the word louder and louder until it screams the word.
It says the “n” word.
On the surface it is in bad taste. But then think of the context for its use. Who is pushing that button. Is the person white or black? Young or old? Why are they pushing that button?
As a “pet rock” novelty, you have to wonder how many would be sold.
The reason is simple: Whites, by and large, want racism in any and all forms to disappear from our National discourse, while Blacks want to feed the smouldering embers of that otherwise dying fire and fan it again into a raging conflagration, to justify their self-serving, denial-strewn desire for unrealistic things like "reparations" (giving taxpayers' money to Blacks because there once were Black slaves) and "a redsitribution of America's wealth" (taking money from those who earned it and giving it to those who either can't or won't earn it).
The problem with this short and short-sighted wish list is that there is no probative justification for either. America gives all her citizens the same opportunities (except in the case of "Affirmative Action," which has tilted the scales of Social Justice in patently unfair favor of Blacks for several decades now, and has done so with no objectively observed positive result—we still have a miasma of racist Blacks whining and snivelling for ever more handouts from a society which has bent over backwards to accommodate their petulantly adolescent beggary and extortions.
The day is quickly coming when these ruptured discontents will crush themselves into oblivion under the unsustainable mass of their pecuniary intolerance and abusive demands.
America will (and has... for decades!) extend a helping hand to those who need assitance getting back up from a fall, but she will not be raped and robbed and sit still for it. The American Black can either crap or get off the pot on this one.
The free ride is over, and the racism being spewed by these amoral slobs is precisely the evil that they pretend to rail against. Enough is enough. Get a life, you bigots.
Or, better still, a job. If, that is, you can find one in Obama's New and Improved [sic] economy.
;-\
This is a common event in Obamastan. DOJ says that it may be a crime to insult a muslim. So, what is it when a muslim says KILL ALL NON BELIEVERS, JEWS ARE DESCENDED FROM PIGS, CONVERT TO ISLAM OR DIE? What about all of the Christians that are being murdered for their faith? What about all the Christian churches that are being burned? Jesus said DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU. I think it’s about time we did to them what they do to us.
What did England do?
Deportation!
They claim africa as their continent of heritage. If they can't follow the laws and customs of America, they should be sent home.
The term “boy” can be used to insult someone if it is preceded by “white” but terming Barack Obama, someone few have wanted to say “no” to a “boy king” with little maturity is “racist”.
Orwellian/Stalinist is what it is.
Maybe I should call Barack a “white boy” king since half of his parentage (and much of his upbringing) was white.
That's not entirely true. It also depends on the political party. As we have seen with Senator Byrd, using a racial slur has no negative consequences whatsoever as long as you are a white DemocRat.
I think if Kirk used the second of the two words Rush used to describe him, he would have been run out of the Senate on a rail.
The fundamental irony here is that ex-Black Panther (Black Panthers used to recognize the 2nd Amendment as a basic human right kept from them by the KKK) Bobby Rush is now working to keep guns out of the hands of Chicago blacks. Such are the things of politics, no?