Eye-opening...thanks for posting. I was at a rally in Tulsa after 9/11and senator Inhofe attended. His aide was with him who was openly homosexual..believe me you could tell, he was a flaming homosexual. I was shocked that someone like Inhofe who claims to be so conservative would have someone like that working so closely with him. I mean he was ready to pick the lint off his coat if needed...that is how close he stuck to the senator. Now before anyone tries to accuse me of saying that homosexuals shouldn’t be allowed to work...that is not it...work for barney Frank, yes, but for Inhofe, no. I don’t know who the guy was but I have never forgot it. Very weird.
Maybe Inhofe had a weakness for being idolized? Just off the top of my head and definitely not a long pondered through conclusion. It could be wrong.
However, this type which defines us as evil and are working to destroy any shred of true morality are the ones who are trying to cram evil down our throats.
I really watched out for myself and my children as they were growing up. My oldest son's kindergarten teacher wanted to take my son fishing, after he had been fired from his job for an alleged impropriety. My boys made it through Eagle without any problems because the troop was maintained by all good, moral dads.
What is in the Gay Manifesto should not surprise us.
Knowing your enemy is the first rule of war.
As I recall, the guy who exposed Mark Foley in 2006 was a homosexual who had worked for GOP candidate Ernest Istook’s failed campaign for OK Governor. These people may be aspiring to become as powerful as the
eunuchs in the Chinese empires.
The reason Inhofe has a queer as a chief aide is that DC rates aides according to their successes.
What successes, you ask? The aides do the dickering (NO, not a pun) over the positional differences of the elected Representative or Senator.
Good aides are highly sought after.
As an example, Rep. Charles Taylor had a chief aide whom I was widely told was a homosexual. Taylor was a strict Constitutionalist, a wealthy man who saw Congressional service as an honor and a man who voted against every Congressional salary increase.
But, Roger was a superb aide.
Here is something to really worry about, far more important than the sexual propensities of aides.
The elected come and go - but the aides stay for a working lifetime.
That, in and of itself, is a clear and transparent reason for reduction of the Federal Government to the size mandated by the Constitution.
A huge government requires a swarm of unelected things like aides, not to mention the usually unspeakable ‘bureaucrat’ in a ‘multitude of offices’.
Time to go a “King James Cure” on ‘em.