Posted on 05/24/2013 10:52:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Via Andrew Stiles, no wonder the IRS wants her out.
Now that she’s gone quiet, we can’t know what her defense would be to the ACLJ’s charges. But I can guess.
We now know through her own testimony and from the Inspector General’s report that Lerner was briefed about this unlawful targeting scheme in June 2011. But nine months later, beginning in March 2012, she sent cover letters to many of our clients – demanding additional information and forwarding intrusive questionnaires. In fact, in March and April of 2012, Lerner sent 15 letters to 15 different clients (including those who were approved after lengthy delays and those who are still pending).
This letter dated March 16, 2012 sent to the Ohio Liberty Council is representative of the other letters that Lerner sent to our clients. This letter, posted here, was sent on letterhead out of the IRS office in Cincinnati. The cover letter bears Lerner’s signature, who runs the Exempt Organizations division out of the Washington, DC office. It includes more invasive and improper questions about membership of the group and demands information about all public events conducted or planned for the future. And it specifically requested information about the organization’s website, Facebook page, and other social media outlets…
In addition to the letter sent to the Ohio Liberty Council, our records indicate that Lerner sent 14 other letters to 14 of our clients in the March-April 2012 timeframe. It’s unclear why her name appears on letters to some organizations, and not others. But one thing is clear: this correspondence shows her direct involvement in the scheme. Further, sending a letter from the top person in the IRS Exempt Organizations division to a small Tea Party group also underscores the intimidation used in this targeting ploy.
According to the ACLJ, not only did tea-party groups continue to get intrusive requests after Lerner first found out about the targeting in June 2011, they continued to get requests after May 2012, when the IRS ostensibly changed the criteria for investigating 501(c)(4) groups to something more politically neutral. The latest letter cited by the ACLJ (but not signed by Lerner) was dated … May 6, 2013, just four days before Lerner’s orchestrated public mea culpa on behalf of the agency for targeting conservatives.
What possible defenses could she have to signing the cover letters? An obvious one, and a hallmark of Hopenchange crisis management, is to plead negligence to rebut the charge of intentional wrongdoing. She’ll say yes, she learned about the tea-party targeting in 2011, but she didn’t pay attention to the cover letters and signed them as a batch without scrutinizing the contents whenever her underlings needed her to. The letters to tea-partiers were mixed in with letters to nonpolitical nonprofits and, well, oops! Obama’s spent the past two weeks pleading ignorance of everything that’s going on in his administration as a defense to the IRS scandal, the DOJ’s pursuit of reporters, and even Benghazi. (O never knew about the repeated requests for more security there, he says.) Copping to being a terrible, disengaged manager rather than a willfully corrupt schemer is working out well for him so far. Why wouldn’t it work for Lerner?
The other obvious defense is to claim that the questions asked of tea-party groups in the later correspondence like the March 16, 2012 letter signed by Lerner or the very recent May 6, 2013 letter posted by the ACLJ don’t go beyond what the IRS is allowed to ask of 501(c)(4) groups under normal circumstances. They’re intrusive but, she could argue, they’re not improperly intrusive. Here’s what the IG report cited as questions that crossed the line:
Put Lerner back in front of Issa’s committee with her Fifth Amendment privilege waived and she’ll probably say that, apart from obviously inappropriate inquiries like a demand for donor lists, it’s a fine line between intrusiveness and simply vetting an org to make sure that their activities don’t involve “indirect” participation in campaigns. That defense would have the added benefit of earning her a bit of liberal support: They’ve been after the IRS ever since Citizens United to start scrutinizing 501(c)(4)s more closely. “My only mistake was being too zealous in my quest to make sure that our elections remain untainted by ‘dark money’ exploitation of our tax laws” etc etc, she could say. Which is nice, but still doesn’t answer the question of why conservative groups were singled out. Even if most/all of the questions in the later tea-party letters were “properly” intrusive, did liberal groups get the same questions? How closely were they scrutinized vis-a-vis conservatives?
While we’re on the topic of Citizens United and early targeting of righties, don’t miss Kimberley Strassel’s op-ed in the Journal today. This goes beyond the IRS, and it began before the CU decision that the left keeps using as a pretext. Exit quotation: “If the country wants to get to the bottom of the IRS scandal, it must first remember the context for this abuse. That context leads to this White House.”
Good deal. Maybe we can convict one solitary criminal.
Obama created this ACORN scheme, of course.
Yes. convict and imprison Lerner and her BOSS Obama. Obama did create this scheme to steal the election
Obama used his IRS to rig the election. The IRS prevented many tea party groups from getting started .Obamas IRS stole the election of 2012. the IRS stole the senate for democrats/socialists and there were many more socialists/democrats that got elected to the House than if the tea party would have been allowed to get out the vote for conservative Rs
Obamas IRS prevented conservative groups from getting started. IRS also Targeted Romney donors and donors to Republicans with audits:
here is a link shows IRS audited Romney donors.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3023043/posts
Obama stole the election. Impeach and imprison Obama. abolish the IRS
now hold on a sec.. did she sign it, or did her secretary use a signature stamp?
(AUDIO) MARK LEVIN: “RINO Issa Didn’t Investigate IRS Before Because He Despises The Tea Party.”
Instead of firing her, she has been put on paid administrative leave.
I think the WH is afraid of her; she's got names of people higher up and she won't take the fall. If the buck stopped with her, I think they would have fired her.
Who gave her orders?
After what happened to True the Vote this is about a lot more than just the IRS, this extends across the executive branch.
IRS also Targeted Romney donors and donors to Republicans with audits:
here is a link shows IRS audited Romney donors.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3023043/posts
She violated conservative civil rights. Convict and imprison her.
LETTER SCHMETTERS...why thousands of letters cross my desk every day an i’m paid to sign ‘em see...sooo...i jus’ sign em see....an there’s no way i can know what’s in every one of em so.....so ..i can’t be blamed for what happens in my shop......you figure it out...oh youse who’re casting the first stone.....(howzatt?) now go away, im busy.
For a possible White House connection.
Someone got hold of her auto pen. /s
Thanks for posting that link.
Levin is so right. Does anyone here believe the democrats or Rino’s want
To see more Tea Party Conservatives in DC?
Just look at the way Issa treated Lerner at the hearings. Lerner was violating
the civil rights of hundreds of Tea Party groups and Issa treated her with
kid groves. She should have been humiliated!
“Obama stole the election. Impeach and imprison Obama. abolish the IRS”
Boehner - Benghazi, MIA
Boehner - IRS, MIA
Boehner - Wire Taps, MIA
Boehner - AP records, MIA
Boehner - Fast and Furious, MIA
Boehner - Covering for Islamic criminals, MIA
Gowdy is a very capable man.
Thanks.
Rowdy Gowdy for President
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.