Posted on 05/22/2013 8:23:46 AM PDT by yoe
A recent military report on sexual assault in the military shocked many in Washington and around the nation, but a leading expert on military personnel revealed the prevalence of men assaulting other men is one of the major headlines in this study.
[snip] Women are identified as the attacker in just two percent of all assaults, meaning most men who suffer assault are targeted by other men.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be Soldiers.... or Sailors... or Airmen... or Marines......
Not now.
Response: Who would have ever guessed that Sodomites around young men would attack. Especiallif in a position of authority.
Wait until they gain control of the Boy Scouts.
Sicker than the Sodomites is a society willing to tolerate them.
The big question is why the victims allow their attacker to live? These people are trained to kill those who would harm them so why the slack?
murder convictions?
Sodomy is no longer optional... it’s required. Rangers are now Rump Rangers.
Don’t you find something queer about this whole issue?
The “Sex Scandal” will now get a good leaving alone.
Probably older higher ranking homos assaulting young guys.
In either case, stronger attacking weaker ?
Higher up chain of command attacking lower ?
Perhaps some wacked out demented guys tricking guys of higher rank into situations where the wacko says he will accuse the victim of assault to ensure his silence ?
I dunno. But when you put sodomites in a military, this is what happens, whether its reported or not.
The only way to prevail when assaulted is to fight back to defend yourself and blow the whistle bigtime.
DO NOT STAND FOR IT.
They are out of the closet now.
I heard a man on Christian radio two weeks discussing this problem. He recently left the military where he dealt directly with sex abuse. He said it was well-known in his office that the official numbers are way way low. I wish I could remember his estimated number of homo assaults.
And that liberals have taken over the military command (one reason the Benghazi men are dead). It's important to know 'what the meaning of IS is"...
The Military needs to define the term 'assault'.
If 'assault' means a straight man rejecting a gay man's advances - and in the process of 'rejection' calling the gay man a name - that's worth knowing.
Liberals think if their 'feelings' are hurt - that it should be a crime - punishable by death. They're nuts. These are the same types who gave a pass to the Ft Hood killer...two standards. One for themselves that's impossibly high - and one for the rest of us who can be treated like garbage. (yeah, the victims and their families at Foot Hood are being treated like garbage)
WE, the citizens of this country who support the military with our tax dollars - need to know the truth. How is the military defining 'assault'.
Is there any listing of assaults in each service, Army, Navy, etc?.........
I suppose I don’t have to say, “we told you so” - but, “WE TOLD YOU SO”.
I don’t believe one word of this until I see the survey and instructions given to the soldiers; in the past these surveys included sexual harrassment and assault, which means any sexually tinged comment that made you uncomfortable. Of course the NCOs tell them they have to report ANY INCIDENT on the survey or they will be in trouble, so PFC Snuffy who’s DI made remarks questioning his sexuality, size of his manhood, etc. back in basic, marks it as being sexually harrassed or assaulted. I have NEVER heard of male on male rape, and I talk to soldiers all the time, and work on a military base. Any FREEPERS who are still green suiters want to weight in on this?
Queers belong in psychiatric wards, not the US military.
“Sicker than the Sodomites is a society willing to tolerate them.”
Yep.
You are right to be skeptical. Being reported (only) at WND does not make it true.
I think a big part of the reasons for putting women in combat units and then in the front lines is the same reasoning that produced the “comfort women” of the Pacific War.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.