[plain talk]

Thanks ... but are you sure? They had a process to investigate non-profit groups to see whether they are eligible or not. This is a normal IRS function that should have always been going on ... like auditing. THEN .. they went after these conservative groups, Tea Party, etc. These new reviews were 100% conservative / 0% liberal. I get that.

But what I am asking about the composite percentages. Unless they are saying that zero liberal groups were audited in total. I would find that hard to believe and I doubt that is the case here.

[Democrat_media]

Obama’s IRS threatened startup conservative groups with perjury if they couldn't answer books of impossible and inappropriate questions . Many groups quit that process as was the IRS’s intention. all this to rig the election for Obama and the democrat senate. democrats/socialists stole the election , stole the presidency and stole the Senate

This was tyranny, oppressive , illegal , unconstitutional.

Obama must be impeached and imprisoned . I know you don't want that

A true conservative is for the IRS not even existing in its supposed function inf the first place

[uncommonsense]

"But what I am asking about the composite percentages. Unless they are saying that zero liberal groups were audited in total. I would find that hard to believe and I doubt that is the case here."

Technically - it wasn't about "auditing", it was about approving the creation of a conservative organization. About 500.

So far, the information published - there was 1 identified pro-Isreal organization that got caught up in the dragnet. Pro-Isreal terms were on the BOLO list (Be On the Look Out).