Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Scientific American used to be both. Now they’re neither.


5 posted on 05/10/2013 6:58:08 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Bump!


11 posted on 05/10/2013 7:04:51 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
Scientific American used to be both. Now they’re neither.

They just have spelling problems, the rag is actually Socialistic American misspelled.

39 posted on 05/10/2013 7:40:29 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

At one time I was interested in subscribing to Scientific American. No longer.


49 posted on 05/10/2013 8:45:44 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Amen to that. I used to have a subscription and I loved the magazine.

I don’t know if they changed or I just started noticing, but the articles started having a political slant. That was not so surprising when they veered into social “science”, but even in articles that should have been strictly scientific, hard science like physics and chemistry, they managed to wedge in some liberal tripe. Don’t even get me started on global warming.

Needless to say, I no longer subscribe.


76 posted on 05/11/2013 5:26:46 AM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson