Gosnell found out early in his murderous career that it was dangerous aborting a child inside the womb, and it required some knowledge and expertise. He found that waiting for a delivery was much safer for the mother and a lot less work.
Of course the idea was to kill the child so he just waited till it was born and then snipped their spinal cord with scissors.
IMO that is the way they should execute him.
OMG--great point and horrible too. But what does the law say about delivered alive babies via abortions? Or does it even address it? This is what the trial's conundrum seems to be about since abortion is legal but infanticide is not. This case is like explosive dynamite to the leftist illogical evil mind.