Skip to comments.NOT BREAKING: Obama and Kerry claim “misinformation” about Benghazi
Posted on 05/03/2013 6:52:40 PM PDT by Kevin in California
There are many things that American voters and the public can stand, but the Obama administrations refusal to acknowledge a different timeline of events is not one of them.
(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
That will teach them to throw the CIA under the bus.
Nice going, geniuses.
They should know. They are masters at misinformation.
Liars Liars, the both of them!
It was not a U.S. consulate that was attacked.
The nearby annex and safe house was a CIA munitions facility.
Outright LIE Follows>
“At first, the Obama administration blamed a southern California-based amateur filmmaker for making an inflammatory video of the Prophet Mohammed, which instigated the protests and demonstrations in Benghazi. However, as news and more information broke, they quickly backtracked on this baseless claim.”
It took almost 4 weeks for them to finally admit the film had no connection.
What about Sean Smith? This website calls itself "Accuracy in Media"?
Oh, was the Obomessiah able to bring him back to life?
From recent reports that cover story was thought of later, because they first guessed it was Al Akayda inspired, but by the time they sent Rice to the Sunday shows, they no long mentioned this. Amazing to me that Romney could not, or would not do anything with the mess that Clinton made.
Exactly right. If you’re going to tick people off...choose wisely.
O characterized Benghazi as a 'bump in the road' not long after the 9/11/'13 attack. Those were his exact words and this was during the debate period ... Mitt Romney should have used this remark by O to his advantage. He didn't for whatever reason and lost the election.
You mean, like the whopper that it was caused by a youtube video, that nobody saw?
No, they were passing the video story line from the beginning.
We saw video’s shot with cell phones of Benghazi that night. There was no mistake from the beginning that Obozo & his commie minions were lying about it.
They try to spin this, but it was a fact that we knew that night. There were discussions here and other places on the web.
It was amazing how fast it happened.
Similar to the Boston thing. MSM criticizes the Twitter feed for inaccuracy, but the MSM was much worse from the beginning there.
I know why Obozo hates social media, it exposes what he really is. He cannot buy them off. His trolls simply cannot make a credible lie to cover for him. The truth wins out.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Mitt also should have made a BIG DEAL out of the fact that BO never attended his security meetings. For some stupid reason he let it go.
Romney won that first debate and then retreated to a neutral corner rather than finish Obama off. I dont think Romney had the stones to be president.
Rigged from the get-go, I believe, by both parties.
Time will tell all.
What is in this link?
The ruling class thus decides who the anointed one is to be? But how else explain Obama, a young man of so little personal accomplishment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.