Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Supreme Court rules both lesbian spouses’ names should be on child’s birth certificate
http://thegazette.com/2013/05/03/iowa-supreme-court-rules-both-lesbian-spouses-names-should-be-on-ch | 3 May 2013, 10:25 am CDT

Posted on 05/03/2013 10:23:16 AM PDT by newgeezer

Iowa Supreme Court rules both lesbian spouses’ names should be on child’s birth certificate

Case surfaced after state refused to list nonbirthing parent on birth certificate

The Iowa Supreme Court Friday affirmed a district court ruling that both spouses in a lesbian marriage should be listed on a child’s birth certificate.

The court ordered the Iowa Department of Public Health to reissue a birth certificate to Melissa and Heather Gartner, of Des Moines, for their daughter, Mackenzie Jean, who was born in September 2009. The department refused to list Melissa, the nonbirthing parent, on the birth certificate.

“It is important our laws recognize that married lesbian couples who have children enjoy the same benefits and burdens as married opposite-sex couples who have children,” the court wrote in a 29-page decision issued Friday.

“By naming the nonbirthing spouse on the birth certificate of a married lesbian couple’s child, the child is ensured supported from that parent and that parents establishes fundamental rights at the moment of birth,” the ruling states.

The Supreme Court’s 2009 Varnum vs. Brien decision legalizing same-sex marriage provides the bedrock for Friday’s decision, the court noted.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: homofascism; homoism; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: newgeezer

let’s get this straight, two woman cannot produce a child, so a child, any child, when born is not the result of human reproduction of two women and yet a “birth certificate” - a certificate recording the result of an act of human reproduction, which cannot be an act achieved by two women, is suppose to lie about what “a birth” means and state, in error of the facts, that the child’s biological mother and her girlfriend are both “mother” of the child

it makes no sense whatsoever and the fact that it makes no sense stands regardless of anyone’s opinion about anyone being “gay”


41 posted on 05/03/2013 12:10:45 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Birth certificates are not supposed to be ownership registrations.


42 posted on 05/03/2013 12:14:43 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

of all the problems we face in this country and there are still some who seem intent on their sexual turn on and making it look like they’re a family.

These people need to stop this nonsense, it makes them look insane and mentally backwards.
The fact is that it takes a male and a female to make a baby

plain and simple

these people need to get a life


43 posted on 05/03/2013 12:19:56 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

You are right. So it isn’t a birth certificate.


44 posted on 05/03/2013 12:25:15 PM PDT by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

I knew a kid raised as a basket case by lesbians. I’m sure he’s committed suicide by this time.


45 posted on 05/03/2013 12:25:40 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

“married lesbian couples who have children enjoy the same benefits and burdens as married opposite-sex couples who have children,”

Sorry, but I’m going to have to say it:

Except for the di*k benefits.


46 posted on 05/03/2013 12:31:50 PM PDT by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

So “parent” doesn’t mean PARENT anymore. Is that what they’re saying?


47 posted on 05/03/2013 12:48:57 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The bastard’s mother is the parent, the other is a nurturer


48 posted on 05/03/2013 12:50:36 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
They put the non-biological father on the birth certificate ALL THE TIME.

It's at least plausible that another man could be the father. But there is absolutely no way that this combination is possible.

Just another example of the re-definition of marriage also redefining parenthood and a multitude of other realities.

49 posted on 05/03/2013 12:51:15 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Just another example of the re-definition of marriage also redefining parenthood and a multitude of other realities.

And, whoever controls the debate gets to define the terms.

For example, who the **** knows (or cares) what "infringed" means anymore?

The very first time the SCOTUS handed down an anti-Constitutional ruling and it was allowed to stand, the writing was on the wall. The actual words in the Constitution mean NOTHING. Dubya's Chief Justice John Roberts made that quite clear with his Obamacare insanity. That may have been the final tipping point. Our precarious 5-4 majority is dissolving before our eyes and will soon be gone. "God Bless America" indeed. He did, even while America kept telling Him to get lost.</rant>

50 posted on 05/03/2013 1:32:39 PM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
It is important our laws recognize that married lesbian couples who have children…

Lesbian "couples" do not have children; one of the women does with the help of a man. The other woman is just a spectator.

51 posted on 05/03/2013 2:22:44 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I remember reading an article maybe 6 months again about a married lesbian couple who had a man donate sperm or maybe they conceived naturally and his name was on the BC. Predictably the lesbians got a divorce. The lesbian mother sued the biological father and won for child support.


52 posted on 05/03/2013 3:04:27 PM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhoda_penmark

Yeah, there’s that!


53 posted on 05/03/2013 3:28:43 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (I may be drunk, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly. (Churchill))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Iowa law to this day recognizes only real marriages.

Likewise in Massachusetts.

54 posted on 05/03/2013 5:42:18 PM PDT by massmike (At least no one is wearing a "Ron Paul - 2016" tee shirt........yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Yep.


55 posted on 05/03/2013 5:52:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Also, who made the turkey baster?

/s

Idiots, all idiots!


56 posted on 05/03/2013 6:02:45 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

so now we have judges who make laws and then after making laws they then make other laws based on their older made up law.

I thought these judges had been replaced by the voters last year or are they the same judges which imposed queer sham on the state?


57 posted on 05/03/2013 6:58:45 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

we have judges just making up laws now and where is the GOP and wy are these judges not been voted out yet?


58 posted on 05/03/2013 6:59:48 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: massmike

they can pretend they’re married and even when I hear anyone saying a homosexual is married I point out tat they’re not

Like being a parent, it takes a man and a woman, plain and simple, they can pretend to play family but they are not a real family and I don’t give a crap to anyone who I say this too either to their face


59 posted on 05/03/2013 7:02:25 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: manc

We got rid of several, but several are left.

And we have such a stupid process for picking judges that the hope of getting any judge who is committed to his oath is practically nil.


60 posted on 05/03/2013 7:46:18 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Life, liberty, property, family, RKBA, sovereignty, security, borders, independence, the oath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson