Even if they have it on Mars and a billion other planets, it is still finite. I understand what they were trying to convey, but the word they want to use is not “infinite”. Maybe “inexhaustible” for humanity. Or “sufficient”.
I understand what you mean, but in terms of human use, it might as well be “infinite” since we’ll have some other, superior source of energy long before we get near exhaustion, if that even occurs.
>> but the word they want to use is not infinite.
Disagree, especially if the lifetime of the potentially regenerative resource exceeds the frame of observation.