>> but the word they want to use is not “infinite”.
Disagree, especially if the lifetime of the potentially regenerative resource exceeds the frame of observation.
Then you are redefining the word “infinite” the way they are trying to redefine “marriage”. In your definition, “infinite” means something that humans can’t exhaust. I’d rather keep the actual meaning, and use another term to describe a resource that we have enough of for our foreseeable future.