Skip to comments.DHS Has Not Issued Terror Alert After Boston Marathon Bombing
Posted on 04/15/2013 10:49:12 PM PDT by Nachum
The Department of Homeland Security has not issued a terror alert in response to Monday's bombings in Boston. On the Department of Homeland Securitys National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) website, the administration says: There are no current alerts.
According to a source with knowledge of these matters, a terror alert "gives authority for full mobilization of law enforcement resources to feds, state and locals. The source told Breitbart News that the administration is supposed to issue such an alert out of the National Counterterrorism Center, via NTAS, but no such alert has been issued after the bombings in Massachusetts.
Describing the NTAS on a Frequently Asked Question page, the Department of Homeland Security says:
When there is credible information about a threat, an NTAS Alert will be shared with the American public. It may include specific information, if available, about the nature of the threat, including the geographic region, mode of transportation, or critical infrastructure potentially affected by the threat, as well as steps that individuals and communities can take to protect themselves and help prevent, mitigate or respond to the threat.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
This could mean they know plenty about the bombers.
It could mean they forgot their protocals as well.
They did away with the color codes.
We now live in a colorless society.
This could mean they know plenty about the bombers.
And that it’s probably not a foreign terrorist group. I’m really hoping it’s not someone who is even remotely connected to the Tea Party.
The most important thing is, when is the next celebrity gathering at the White House?
It’s been party, party, party.
Let’s not have an interruption, shall we?
So.. if caught in the act.. would it have been legal under the Geneva Convention to shoot the perp with one of the DHS’s 1.4 billion hollow point bullets?
It could be a foreign terrorist group, just a localized cell.
Yes. Or that they own them.
LOL....he keeps his hair and make up staff busy.
Why is he wearing an earring and a Mardis Gras necklace?
Could very well me a lone islamic nut wanting to show off for Al Qaeda..trust me, that “Person of interest” IS their #1 suspect..they are just using protocol so that he won’t demand his Miranda rights..they are searching right now an apartment complex in Revere..I have a feeling this “person of interest” lives there
No. Black 1st, Brown 2nd and Yellow just behind or equal to White.
Racism will be just one aspect of the Obama legacy.
Who’s the dude with the mike?
Whos the dude with the mike?
She/it is our tough butch. Doesn’t it make you feel more secure having a butch dyke in charge of homeland security?
Really, how does that ever happen in a sane world?
Meant to say mic. But yes we are in deep trouble when our country is run by Godlessness. Deep trouble.
I doubt it’s a domestic group but the DHS wold certainly like to imply that it was as per their usual demonization.
Domestic groups target government offices and politicians.
Terrorists target the people.
Perhaps DHS placed it in the “Workplace Violence Alert” tab on their website. This early in the year it could be called “Workplace Violence Alert Abdullah” or if we forgot the first one already...”Workplace Violence Alert Achmed”.
“Domestic groups target government offices and politicians.
Terrorists target the people.”
Federal gov’t terrorists target people...think Waco...
Federal gov’t terrorists target gov’t offices...think Oklahoma City...
That, or the civil servant webmasters are woefully derelict of duty.
Where are all of Obamas fly friends?
I did a little channel surfing early this morning and it just seemed to me as if the MSM was acting in a strange manner. The folks on ABC were talking about how hard it is for the FBI to track and uncover some of these people/groups, etc. Almost seemed like they were giving cover. I couldn’t help but wonder what the coverage would’ve been like had Bush been in office?
Obama’s talk last night about not rushing to judgement also had me wondering: who was he talking about? Don’t rush to believe it was a white TEA Party guy? Or, more likely, don’t rush to believe it was a peaceful Muslim.
Look at that Picture.
Does that make you feel safe?
That frightens the crap out of me to think these two are in charge of my safety.
Neither one is smart enough to bell a buzzard.
Let's be real - Homeland Security is very busy tracking and
demonizing law abiding American citizens. They don't have time
to keep track of every muslim terrorist wanna-be.
This heralds that the murders were a probable DHS/Obama plan.
We will know the identity of the evil-doers soon.
First Obama and Janetalia have to decide which group of conservatives they want to hang it on.
Sure looks like that fella’s wearing a cocaine mustache and some got on his head as well.
Shades of “Scarface”
The lack of an alert is perfectly rational. They had no hint of the Boston attack. It is therefore reasonable they have no knowledge of any other attacks.
The damage from over reacting is greater than the event. After all, there were only two killed in Boston. That is half of the toll in Bengazi. That means the efforts are actually decling in force. That means we are actually winning. /s
That’s a keeper.
Big Sis: “Hurt by sequestration” but
Mar 01, 2013 · The U.S. border is secure and it is time to move forward on comprehensive immigration overhaul
If it was a Timothy McVeigh-type it would be five-alarm terror alert.
More than likely, it was a targeted attack. The WH knew the Boston Marathon was a target.
The more people involved in the operation, the more likely the noise will be picked up.
If they honestly didn’t know it was ROP, the President would not have warned us about jumping to conclusions. He would have been on his “punish the guilty and the people who drove them to it” soapbox.
Maybe the carrier pigeons addressed to the DHS’ emailophobic chief got lost.
I don't; the FBI was intimately involved in Ruby Ridge, IIRC.
Oh, well in that case it makes a lot of sense. You see the "muslim terrorist wanna-be" is not a threat to our overlords, only to mere citizens, whereas the [armed] citizen is a threat to the overlord. It's a win-win situation for them: the terrorists kill people that they consider a threat and, likely, the people will clamor for more restriction on their liberties... or at least not complain as much when so restricted.