Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut Drafts Gun Law In Secret
ammoland.com ^ | 10 April, 2013 | Alan Korwin

Posted on 04/11/2013 5:51:52 AM PDT by marktwain

PHOENIX, AZ --(Ammoland.com)- Can you imagine what a tough uphill struggle the anti-gun-rights people would have if the “news” media wasn’t falling all over itself to support the anti-rights side?

Connecticut just drafted 138 pages of gun law basically in secret, enacted it before it could be read and digested by those who signed it – and certainly not by the public it pretends to legitimately control -- and in doing so ended up requiring federally licensed agents in the state to violate federal law, or flatly deny citizens their rights. Just on practical grounds this is a disaster. But that’s nothing, according to leading experts.

Legislators who draft laws in secret are behaving like the king’s men who ignited the American Revolution. They can expect no less if they continue down such a dark road, many experts say.

What did the officials choose to draft law against by this nefarious method? Only the very palladium of liberty, the very thing the Revolution warned us to guard against, a bill to reduce and actually eliminate a right for keeping and bearing arms the public already legally keeps.

Along with a list of many of the most popular makes and models in use today, the bill includes broad descriptions of arms to cover an untold number of other modern and older firearms. Are they out of their minds?

Is it an excuse that they didn’t know what they were doing? Of course not. That is an aggravating factor.

These officials operate by consent of the governed, with rights of minorities protected. Laws are to be drafted in public, with input from experts and the public. They deliberately and with malice aforethought chose not to.

Infringement is banned by the Bill of Rights. This is not some debating point. Violation of the Bill of Rights is an offense against We the People, and throughout our history has earned punishment. Not just at the ballot box, but real punishment. Else, what value the Bill of Rights?

Requiring agents of the federal government, in this case, licensed federal firearms dealers (FFLs), to conduct paperwork and electronic examinations of private citizens which the agents are banned by law from doing, is a clever way to stop citizens from getting firearms. It is also malfeasance of the worst kind, and deserves punishment of the highest order. This isn’t just use-the-other-lunch-counter bigotry, this is the no-lunch-counter-for-you brand.

(Connecticut is requiring FFLs to conduct background checks on private firearm transfers, and offers to pay them. It is a federal offense for FFLs to use the NICS background check system for anything other than their own authorized business sales.)

But the worst offense remains drafting and proposing such treasonous poison in secret. Merely voting for it is no less serious an act. Legislators who participated in this infringement of the fundamental civil and human rights of the citizens of Connecticut act as enemies of American freedom whether they recognize it or not. This is not how Americans behave.

Using the acts of a madman to justify the acts of these madmen is reprehensible, immoral and corrupt. Worse, their failure to act in a way that might actually identify and curb future deranged monsters is a failure to accomplish their most rudimentary role. It is abrogation of their responsibility as elected officials. This is grounds for removal from office.

How should the public react when their officials depart from the rule of law, act without concern for established procedure, quorum in secret, enact laws without public knowledge, defy existing law and issue proclamations that cannot legally be met? Cheering them on, as the mainstream media has been encouraging, is irrational. Irrational acts in this arena bring up the specter of hoplophobia, the morbid fear of weapons. Is this supposed political problem in actuality an undiagnosed medical one?

When the king chooses to post laws too high on the wall to be read, issues edicts that cannot be tolerated, takes actions without the consent of the governed, allows representatives but does not allow them to represent their constituents, and attempts to strip from the public the main tools they possess to guarantee their safety and independence in deference to his own, what course can the public be expected to steer?

Perhaps the most curious element of the Connecticut approach to gun law, and the most dangerous facet of this entire adventure, is that government officials have exempted themselves from this whole proclamation.

They remain free to own, possess and use every bit of this lethal arsenal they forbid to the public.

If these implements are so dastardly, so deadly, so powerful, so dangerous they must be banned from We the People, how on Earth can We the People possibly entrust them to the hands of, well, who exactly?

Under what rationale can all the “designated” people in this secretly operating government be allowed to possess such awesome firepower? Such high capacity? Such dark guns with so many features? Do Blacks in America trust the man quite that much? Do you? Just who do they think they need it for? Do they face murderers the public does not? Just who do murderers murder?

Isn’t it the government that is the corrupt, immoral, capable of every imaginable act of deceit, deception, official malfeasance, coverup, fraud, theft and mayhem we see in the nightly “news“? Do criminals seek out police to assault, or do they seek out us innocently in theaters, schools, shops and our homes? If the police keep saying they’re outgunned, hey, they’re the second responders, anyone can see that on the “news.”

If anyone needs arms capable of repelling boarders, it’s the public — the people crime is perpetrated upon.

If the government needs all this sophisticated weaponry, feels it must exempt itself from the laws it proposes to control us, how does that square with the fact that it is government that is the greatest murderer of people, and has been throughout all of recorded history?

If the anti-rights Americans on the left have their way, led now by Connecticutters, we would be relegated to little guns that don’t work well, with only a few small bullets, that fire the small bullets slowly and then we would be out. This is not the balance of power the Founders sought. Small guns with a few bullets are not safe. Limited power does not keep your own government in check. Government arguing to limit your power in deference to its own is government not to be trusted.

When we the people have pop guns, and the government by law grants unto itself the power to own and use all the serious guns on the list it forbids to us, the free country we all want is over, and that cannot be allowed to pass.

That is the way of a tyrannical government that does not trust its people. The excuse that this is for our own safety is abject nonsense. “Disarming you for your own safety” has been the rubric of every tyrant of the last century. Sorry, Connecticut, even if you mean well, history has got you there. And if you do mean well, perhaps worse, it makes you classic useful idiots.

But cling to hope, you in Connecticut. You can yet act for your own safety. Trash this nasty unconstitutional feckless illegal infringement approach.

Start dealing immediately with mental misfits who create the atrocities you seek to cure. Face up to Big Pharma, and the psychotropic drugs they blitz advertise that have been found in the majority of the mass killers. Yes, that’s true. Make that grotesque empirical anomaly the issue it is, not the guns the innocent public owns, which you assault at great peril to yourselves.

Start dealing immediately with the problem of state-run health departments and the AMA and HIPPA’s constant failure and adamantine resistance to disclosing mental health records of the truly sick. Fix the prohibited possessor list, where the problem really exists and stop flying the false flag of gun registration disguised as background checks. Writing down the names of the innocent in a big FBI book has no crime-fighting component.

Immediately acknowledge that lunatic control is severely lacking, and your 138 pages of mainstream-lauded Connecticut law keeps this record perfectly intact. By strengthening government arsenals with the deadliest weapons, denying decent firearms to the public, operating in secret and banning the right to keep and bear arms through legal trickery, you demonstrate your own need for treatment, and lack of ability to legislate in a meaningful way on a critically important issue. You can stop patting yourselves on the back now.

And know well that your use of tragedy to advance the infringements of freedom-hating bigots around you will only make matters worse, as we have seen throughout history.

You are ignoring forces moving America to an awful place it finds itself in today: rabid incessant encouragement of insane blood-letting violence coming out of TV, Hollywood, video games, comic books, the web, social media, and non-stop “news” media glorification of these horrific perps, planning the next big thing right now. They laugh at your silly new law while you cry oh what a good boy am I.

Is it any wonder the public is outraged by your actions, media propagandists’ adulations notwithstanding.

The media’s complicity in all this only cements the enlightened public’s understanding of “news” media’s role as one of the greatest enemies American freedom currently faces.

Our goal now must be the addition of millions of new enlightened gun owners. There are one hundred million of us safely armed in more than half of all homes. Can you imagine what an impossible uphill struggle you anti-gun-rights people would have if the “news” media wasn’t falling all over itself to support your side? Gun save lives. Guns stop crime. Guns protect you. Guns keep you safe. Guns are good. Guns are why America is still free. You don’t hear much of that side, do you. The rest of us understand it as the rock solid core of what makes America America.

////////

Alan Korwin’s newest book, his 14th, YOUR FIRST GUN: Should you buy one and join 60 million safely armed American homes? helps people move past their fears and into the ranks of gun ownership. His book Supreme Court Gun Cases, co-written with David Kopel Stephen P. Halbrook in 2003 was ranked as one of the ten best Second Amendment books of all time. You can reach him at GunLaws.com.

About GunLaws.com: Scottsdale, Ariz.-based Bloomfield Press, founded in 1988, is the largest publisher and distributor of gun-law books in the country. Our website, gunlaws.com, features a free national directory to gun laws and relevant contacts in all states and federally, along with our unique line of related books and DVDs. “After Your Shoot” for media review is available on request, call 800-707-4020. Our authors are available for interview, call to schedule. Call for cogent positions on gun issues, informed analysis on proposed laws, talk radio that lights up the switchboard, fact sheets and position papers. As we always say, “It doesn’t make sense to own a gun and not know the rules.” Visit: www.gunlaws.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; corruption; ct; democrats; govtabuse; guncontrol; gunlaws; liberalfascism; tyranny; waronliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Alan does a good job here. Full disclosure: Alan is a good freind. I have known him for nearly 20 years.
1 posted on 04/11/2013 5:51:52 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Our Republic was founded on the basis of a very, very powerful document. It’s only flaw is that in order for it to succeed, its citizenry must be comprised of honest men.

We have reached a tipping point. Our government, our courts and our schools have been infested with the most vile creatures this earth can sustain. They equal or better the worst this world has ever seen; they just have not been able (yet) to demonstrate that. You can be certain, if the succeed in their consolidation, they will.

There is no talking with them, there is no reasoning with them; and there is no recourse in government, the courts or in a media that isn’t so ideologically polluted with liberalism.

We will have to fight these people in the streets one day, if we are to survive as our founders intended.


2 posted on 04/11/2013 5:59:30 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I just saw a Connecticut license plate this morning and it says, “Constitution State” on it. What a BUNCH OF LIARS!


3 posted on 04/11/2013 6:01:06 AM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
All Connecticut arms manufacturers should immediately plan moves out of state and loudly proclaim why. All 2nd Amendment supporters and groups should boycott the state and tell them why. Recalls should be started against all legislators where possible. Legislators should be personally shunned and business refused. Everyone’s future as free citizens is on the line.
4 posted on 04/11/2013 6:07:23 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Dark days ahead for sure.

And a large percentage of the electorate loves it.

IMHO


5 posted on 04/11/2013 6:09:44 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
I agree, but I wonder how many people understand how very ugly that is going to be?

The good guys are going to have to do some very bad things. Very bad. And if the good guys and the supporters of the good guys decide to stand around and tut-tut and say, "See here, my good fellow! That won't do at all! It's just not sporting to fight tyranny in such a fashion! I say, let's do follow decent rules, shall we?"

That's how you lose.

When the SHTF, be prepared to enthusiastically support some bad stuff.

6 posted on 04/11/2013 6:10:55 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The ballot box is a sham. Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“I see Satan laughing with delight.........” Don McLain


7 posted on 04/11/2013 6:11:01 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory (ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: showme_the_Glory

A sad reminder of an America gone past. “Drove my Chevy to the levy.....” has a different meaning now.

Now constructed of union liabilities and investor screwing and government corruption..

That prior name of Americana is so dead to me along with a thousand others.


8 posted on 04/11/2013 6:18:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Any arms and/or ammo manufacturer should be boycotted until they move. Buy a share of stock, introduce a stockholders’ proposal to move out of CT (and NY), demand to know what effect staying in CT (and NY) is causing on sales and profits and defend the proposal at the annual meeting.


9 posted on 04/11/2013 6:23:36 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/highway-patrol-gave-feds-missouri-weapon-permits-data/article_266b644e-a235-11e2-a8e7-0019bb30f31a.html

The Missouri State Highway Patrol has twice turned over the entire list of Missouri concealed weapon permit holders to federal authorities, most recently in January, Sen. Kurt Schaefer said Wednesday.

The list was given to the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General, Schaefer said he was told.

“Apparently from what I understand, they wanted to match up anyone who had a mental diagnosis or disability with also having a concealed carry license,” Schaefer said. “What I am told is there is no written request for that information.”

h/t Drudge

10 posted on 04/11/2013 6:23:40 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley

With all this nonsense going on, and actually getting worse, it’s only a matter of time before a small segment of the US public combines insatiable anger and outrage over such affronts with a realization of just how small a portion of the US population (circa mid to late 1770s) actually took up arms - successfully - against the British.

At that point things are going to get a lot worse. And very very messy.


11 posted on 04/11/2013 6:25:03 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“Drove my Chevy to the levy”? ROFL

How about LEVEE?


12 posted on 04/11/2013 6:28:12 AM PDT by BB62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
Whoa.....I don't even know where to begin on this. It sure paints a clear picture on the behind-the-scenes collusion of government agencies in violating the rights of law abiding citizens. We're beyond Banana Republic here and we're knee deep in the U.S.S.A.
13 posted on 04/11/2013 6:28:30 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BB62

Poetic license...Chebby.....Lebby


14 posted on 04/11/2013 6:29:30 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Mississippi has lots of room and a welcoming people and government. Come and join Olin/Winchester here.


15 posted on 04/11/2013 6:34:59 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Start dealing immediately with mental misfits who create the atrocities you seek to cure. Face up to Big Pharma, and the psychotropic drugs they blitz advertise that have been found in the majority of the mass killers. Yes, that’s true. Make that grotesque empirical anomaly the issue it is, not the guns the innocent public owns, which you assault at great peril to yourselves.

After the history of our times is written, it's going to seem extremely strange to people of the future we didn't even think about these drugs, but went on a gun prohibition spree instead. They're going to wonder how we could possibly have been so stupid.

16 posted on 04/11/2013 6:36:33 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

No. There isn’t any more room. In the winter it’s freezing. In the summer it’s blazing hot with 100% humidity. For months at a time. The mosquitos are big enough to carry grown men off and what they don’t eat the chiggers and ticks do!

Do NOT move to Mississippi!


17 posted on 04/11/2013 6:40:50 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“A sad reminder of an America gone past. “Drove my Chevy to the levy.....” has a different meaning now.”

It still has lots of meaning in Mississippi. We have levees from top to bottom of the state, and Chevys too.


18 posted on 04/11/2013 6:41:59 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

So, Black Agnes, you choose tyrany over a few little mesquitos and some steamy days and nights?


19 posted on 04/11/2013 6:53:46 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Texas is gun friendly too. When times were tough long ago the phrase was GTT (Gone to Texas).


20 posted on 04/11/2013 6:55:31 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson