In the end Rand Paul’s beliefs will be exactly like his old man’s. The old man was for sodomite “marriage” and the old man voted to legitimize sodomy in the Armed Forces. I guarantee you if Rand Paul had been in the senate during the repeal vote of DADT he would have voted to lift the ban on sodomites openly serving in the US Armed Forces. He tries to fool people into believing he’s a traditional conservative. He’s not, he’s a libertarian exactly like the old man. And he has the weird libertarian views like legalizing drugs and never starting a war and letting people do what they feel like doing. If they want to “marry” their dog that’s OK with him. Don’t be fooled by this Ron Paul clone.
That worries me. You may be right. Just last month he introduced a Life Begins at Conception Bill before the Senate. But before the ink was even dry, he went on to explain there are "thousands of exceptions". If Paul wants to be taken seriously - he must reject and denounce liberaltarianism.
Are you proclaiming to be a mind reader? a "teller of the future"? A "medium"?
If your answer is no, they why would you proclaim such a thing?
What's weird is hyperinflating drug profits and channeling those profits into criminal hands, which is all the War on Drugs can be shown to be accomplishing.
Agreed. He says some great things if you don’t listen too closely. That’s why I say he’s right about needing a spiritual cleansing and leave it at that.
He’s trying to bridge the (perhaps) unbridgeable gap between libertarians and traditional-values conservatives. Each one, if taken to its extreme, eliminates the other. Possibly each side must give way for a candidate to harness both sides. But then you could have the result we used to call “falling between two stools”—nobody wins.