Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul Says America Needs A "Spiritual Cleansing"
CBN News ^ | 04/10/2013 | David Brody

Posted on 04/10/2013 8:16:17 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

In an exclusive interview with The Brody File, Senator Rand Paul says America needs a, “spiritual cleansing of the people” and explains that “salvation” doesn’t come through elected leaders.

The Brody File spent a couple days with Rand Paul and his family down in Kentucky. Rand Paul’s wife (Kelley Paul) sat for the interview as well at their home in Bowling Green Kentucky.

The national profile on him (including an interview with his wife) will air on The 700 Club Thursday. We are releasing some clips ahead of the interview. We will also release more clips on Thursday. Much of this material is NOT in the final 700 Club piece.

Also, watch our Brody File show this week where we devote the entire thirty minutes to our Rand Paul coverage. Watch here.

Senator Rand Paul: “I think it’s important that people know that for the country to get better it needs more than just politicians. Politicians aren’t enough and it needs resurgence through churches, through revivals through a spiritual cleansing of the people."

Senator Rand Paul: “Changing a particular law is not going to make us a better people but that comes from the people themselves.”

Senator Rand Paul: “I don’t want people to think that salvation comes through elected leaders. It doesn’t.”

Senator Rand Paul:  “What’s the number one cause of poverty in America? It’s having kids before you’re married. Can you have a law to prevent that? I don't think any law even if you did have a law couldn't prevent it from happening. We have to convince kids that it's a big huge mistake not only from a religious point of view but from an economic point of view that it's not a good idea to have kids before you're married. The hard part is then people say you’re harsh and you’re against single moms. Well, I’m not against single moms. I just want to talk to them before they become the single mom. I want to talk to them when they’re 17 years old and convince them wait, get married and your life will be better and it’s a better way to do things.”

Senator Rand Paul: "People say you shouldn't talk about moral issues. Well, I think there are moral issues that no law will be able to fix but there's no reason why a political leader can't also have some impact in moral issues that really the law may not be able to fix but maybe by me saying that the marriage unit, the marriage unit, the family unit is an important structure, it's been with us for thousands of years and we shouldn't give up on that."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: randpaul; randpaulchristian; randpaulinterview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last
Sen Paul is right. Only after American citizens wake up spiritually, will we wake up politically and economically.

But his example of passing a law preventing people from having kids before marriage misses the obvious.

Why not repeal laws that promote and encourage these welfare babies?

Make no mistake: You CAN legislate morality. The question is - whose morality?

For the last 40 years we've had a code of legal morals and ethics that are dead set on the destruction of the family and of America. And as a natual result - our economy is down the tubes.

1 posted on 04/10/2013 8:16:17 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Agreed.

But I also think we need a D.C. Cleansing as well...


2 posted on 04/10/2013 8:21:40 AM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
A little study in backstep analysis by Sen Paul would accrue to his benefit...
3 posted on 04/10/2013 8:22:07 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
He's right. In fact I think FReepers could use a spiritual cleansing as well. Too much of a screw everybody attitude around here when attempting to inspire hope doesn't cost a dime.

I will not stand by and watch this great country destroy itself under mediocre leadership that drifts from one crisis to the next, eroding our national will and purpose. We have come together here because the American people deserve better from those to whom they entrust our nation's highest offices, and we stand united -- we stand united in our resolve to do something about it.

Ronald Reagan 1980 Republican National Convention Acceptance Address delivered 17 July 1980, Detroit, MI
4 posted on 04/10/2013 8:22:16 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

A spiritual cleansing is exactly what we need.


5 posted on 04/10/2013 8:23:22 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Exclusive: Rand Paul Says Political Leaders Message Should Be To "Fix The Country's Economy Not To Fix The Country's Moral Nature."


In an exclusive interview with The Brody File, Senator Rand Paul says America should be led by moral and religious leaders but, “their overriding message is to fix the country's economy not to fix the country's moral nature." Paul also says that a winning candidate can be a social conservative, “but if that's the only issue you do estrange some people.”

The Brody File spent a couple days with Rand Paul and his family down in Kentucky. Rand Paul’s wife (Kelley Paul) sat for the interview as well at their home in Bowling Green Kentucky.

The national profile on him (including an interview with his wife) will air on The 700 Club Thursday. We are releasing some clips ahead of the interview. We will also release more clips on Thursday. Much of this material is NOT in the final 700 Club piece.

Also, watch our Brody File show this week where we devote the entire thirty minutes to our Rand Paul coverage. Watch here.

Senator Rand Paul (On whether social issues need to minimized within the GOP): “I think sort of the in-between is that it doesn't mean you can't elect or won't elect people who are socially conservative but if that's the only issue you do estrange some people but what I’m saying is that you need a candidate who does believe in your issues, who doesn’t try to be something they’re not but also recognizes that what brings the country together and what people are trying to figure out is how do I get my brother a job? How do I get my sister a job? How do I get the economy growing? It is important though that a country and a civilization have moral underpinnings but I think if it's only about that then I think you need to be finding who the next Billy Graham is and we need both."

Senator Rand Paul: "You want moral and religious people I think to be your leaders but their overriding message is to fix the country's economy not to fix the country's moral nature."

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

He's wrong. Paul - and every other pol needs to understand the fundamentals:

 It doesn't matter a damn thing what your economic ideals are - if you aren't on the right track morally - you aren't going to succeed economically either.


6 posted on 04/10/2013 8:23:33 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Tyrant Kim Un Hussein must be very pleased that his efforts to “FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” are progressing so easily.


7 posted on 04/10/2013 8:25:01 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Reality tends to enforce “natural law”.

Take away the laws and policies that alleviate consequences for immoral behavior, and you’ll have less of that behavior.


8 posted on 04/10/2013 8:30:14 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

In the end Rand Paul’s beliefs will be exactly like his old man’s. The old man was for sodomite “marriage” and the old man voted to legitimize sodomy in the Armed Forces. I guarantee you if Rand Paul had been in the senate during the repeal vote of DADT he would have voted to lift the ban on sodomites openly serving in the US Armed Forces. He tries to fool people into believing he’s a traditional conservative. He’s not, he’s a libertarian exactly like the old man. And he has the weird libertarian views like legalizing drugs and never starting a war and letting people do what they feel like doing. If they want to “marry” their dog that’s OK with him. Don’t be fooled by this Ron Paul clone.


9 posted on 04/10/2013 8:33:23 AM PDT by NKP_Vet ("The only glory in war is surviving")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

RE: A “Spiritual Cleansing”

THE ACLU cries as usual — “Separation of Church and State”.


10 posted on 04/10/2013 8:35:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

But he’s also right. There are serious limits on what the government can do to promote spiritual health. In fact, I really don’t want them to try. The best it can do is absence of harm. Just get out of the way. The most obvious example is to stop subsidizing spritual rot; do away with welfare and the artificial unlimited demand for illegitimate children. There is no surprise that the result will be an unlimited supply of them.

In the end, the government is only a reflection of the spiritual state of the nation. It is a creation of the people that want it. People will have to have their spiritual re-awakening on a personal level, and won’t do it because the goverment passed a law requiring it. Like Prohibition and drugs; people will do what they want, and laws won’t stop them. Only when people don’t want to do illegal drugs, and don’t want to have illegitimate children, will they stop doing or having them.


11 posted on 04/10/2013 8:35:38 AM PDT by henkster (I have one more cow than my neighbor. I am a kulak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Responsibility2nd:

The Eight Steps in the Evolution of Democracy (Professor
Alexander Tyler, 1787)
These eight steps were written in 1787 by Professor Alexander Tyler.
The United States was in the planning process of a young and fragile Democracy.
So, this Professor took a look at the past and tried to map out the evolution of a Democracy.
He determined a time line for these eight steps and an estimate of how long the process would take, 200 years.

* From bondage to spiritual faith;
* From spiritual faith to great courage;
* From courage to liberty;
* From liberty to abundance;
* From abundance to complacency;
* From complacency to apathy;
* From apathy to dependence;
* From dependence back into bondage.


12 posted on 04/10/2013 8:43:18 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt ("Political correctness is tyranny with manners." - Charlton Heston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
In the end Rand Paul’s beliefs will be exactly like his old man’s.

 

That worries me. You may be right. Just last month he introduced a Life Begins at Conception Bill before the Senate. But before the ink was even dry, he went on to explain there are "thousands of exceptions". If Paul wants to be taken seriously - he must reject and denounce liberaltarianism.

13 posted on 04/10/2013 8:47:05 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

He is right. We should start with government itself, and mainstream TV networks that promote degeneration which it has become.


14 posted on 04/10/2013 8:47:44 AM PDT by Vinylly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

Gee, I wonder which step America is on right now?

/s


15 posted on 04/10/2013 8:49:11 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: henkster
There are serious limits on what the government can do to promote spiritual health.

Hogwash. The government has created monetary support systems to eliminate financial responsibility for bad choices. Single mom's have dozens of government support programs. Gays spreading Aids have scores of government support programs. When self destructive behavior is allowed to reap the natural consequences, repentance is more likely to occur.

16 posted on 04/10/2013 8:58:21 AM PDT by aimhigh ( Guns do not kill people. Abortion kills people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

An enema is what we need.


17 posted on 04/10/2013 9:01:26 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Read the rest of the post before commenting, please.


18 posted on 04/10/2013 9:02:36 AM PDT by henkster (I have one more cow than my neighbor. I am a kulak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Great post. Your reply exemplifies why I say you CAN legislate morality.

It’s just way past time we turned around the moral direction our county is headed in and repeal these destructive laws.


19 posted on 04/10/2013 9:03:16 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Amen! The “sex culture” is fully alive and in ALL our faces, especially targeting our youth.

Thanks to billy, the youngsters do not see oral sex as sex.

Remember those wrist bands the young ones used to wear, which indicated “how far they went”?

Disgusting!


20 posted on 04/10/2013 9:08:37 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Praise the Lord! Seems like we need to take out everyone of them, with a few exceptions.


21 posted on 04/10/2013 9:09:39 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Morality is the main (if not only) reason for Laws and government. Without “Justice” a government is totally evil and dysfunctional. Justice is a Virtue. Virtues are a standard of “morality”. Virtue determined what is “good and evil” since the Nicomachean Ethics.

Socrates stated that the only reason for education is to teach Virtue. Justice is the Queen of Virtues-—that is ALL about morality!!!!

Cultural Marxists target Virtues-—destroy it. Machiavelli even stated that without Virtue, you can not have a Free Republic or an effective military.

That is why sodomy is forced into the military by the Satanist zero-—to destroy Virtue—promoting Vice will destroy the military-—they will become like the Nazi homosexual Brownshirts—Brutal immature, evil people will drive out, intimidate the “good”—people who won’t join in their orgies. And they use boys in those orgies-—like Sugar Keynes at Harvard (the darling of the Left who bragged about castrating boys in 3rd world countries and advised his elite friends at Harvard and other elite institutions where to find boys at Eton or whereever for their orgies. This is a sick mind which designed the economic system which collapsed England and is taught in all our universities probably all sodomites.

(Why the push to normalize anal sex in all books and movies/tv (Glee)—”shades of grey”-—and this intimidation of any company that doesn’t go along with their evil agenda-—so little boys will be corrupted by sick concepts that should never occur to them unless they are sexually abused. They want the control over the minds of your little boys-—like Jerry Brown has-—to normalize sodomy in our culture).

It really makes me mad that Lawmakers don’t even realize the Marxist thinking which states “you can’t legislate morality!” We DO IT ALL THE TIME with murder laws (from 10 Commandments).

We built Western CIvilization since Cicero—on ideas of Universal Truths (morality of Natural Law Theory).

FIXED NATURAL LAWS are part of our Constitution. Universal Truths are part of our Supreme Law of the land. The Marxist’s judges are removing God and removing morality from children=-—it is Cultural Marxism to sexualize young children to destroy morality concerning the sex act-—to destroy the culture. Releasing sex from morality-—which homosexual “marriage” does-—there is no Right and Wrong way to use the sex organ-—you remove Natural Laws, Rule of Law , and God.

We will collapse if “homosexual” marriage is normalized for children. We will be sick and warped-—our children who grow up and “see” this which shapes all their worldview-—and normalizes the behavior-—like the little warped boys in harems in Afghanistan.

Evil Marxists, sodomites-—like the Fr. Oko report explains-—they are Fascists/totalitarians/Marxists and they want your little boys to be warped, so they are easy prey when they turn 12. The age of consent will be lowered-—we will have Nero’s lifestyle normalized (he castrated a boy and “married” him). Sick warped people (homosexuals who “think” their “lifestyle” is “normal” are irrational and evil—they are immature-—fixated and addicted to base instincts—controlled by their lust—never Reason/Intellect.


22 posted on 04/10/2013 9:10:35 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

What’s up with FR these days. Seems to be the “sleeper cells” are coming out and nothing is being done to ZOT them.


23 posted on 04/10/2013 9:11:11 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

You CANNOT legislate morality. You can legislate morally, however. As in character does matter and no one, I mean, NO ONE is above the law.


24 posted on 04/10/2013 9:11:45 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

EXCELLENT!

Thank you.


25 posted on 04/10/2013 9:12:59 AM PDT by kitkat (STORM THE HEAVENS WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie; little jeremiah

Awesome reply.

Hey LJ! How are you? This thread is one for the M/A pinglist


26 posted on 04/10/2013 9:14:19 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; cripplecreek
" I guarantee you if Rand Paul had been in the senate during the repeal vote of DADT he would have voted to lift the ban on sodomites openly serving in the US Armed Forces."

Are you proclaiming to be a mind reader? a "teller of the future"? A "medium"?

If your answer is no, they why would you proclaim such a thing?

27 posted on 04/10/2013 9:15:22 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
You CANNOT legislate morality. You can legislate morally, however.

Splitting hairs. Six of one - half dozen of another. A fine distinction. Same difference.

Point is - we have tons of immoral laws on the books. And our economy reflects our stupid moral choices. Only way out is to revoke immoral laws and replace them with Godly, moral and Constitutional laws.

28 posted on 04/10/2013 9:20:41 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

>>>What’s up with FR these days. Seems to be the “sleeper cells” are coming out and nothing is being done to ZOT them.>>>

AMEN


29 posted on 04/10/2013 9:20:55 AM PDT by kitkat (STORM THE HEAVENS WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The reason the government can never become “moral” is that the bureaucracy - through and through - is leftist. There is no morality there.

You could have God himself elected president and the bureaucrats would never budge from their lefty agenda.

This is why the most important thing is to starve the “beast government” down to size. Which is why I only vote for those who will put the screws to government - in all its forms. We should only worry about being moral on a personal level - it is clear that a moral politician (which is an oxymoron) can ever reign in this monster we have all had a hand in creating.

Starve the beast - and if Rand Paul is for starving the FedGov, I’m for him.


30 posted on 04/10/2013 9:27:53 AM PDT by LibertyLA (fighting libtards and other giant government enablers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
And he has the weird libertarian views like legalizing drugs

What's weird is hyperinflating drug profits and channeling those profits into criminal hands, which is all the War on Drugs can be shown to be accomplishing.

31 posted on 04/10/2013 9:37:07 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
But his example of passing a law preventing people from having kids before marriage misses the obvious.

Why not repeal laws that promote and encourage these welfare babies?

I'd be stunned to learn that Rand Paul doesn't support that repeal.

32 posted on 04/10/2013 9:40:26 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Three headed Hydra meets Godzilla:
Hydra:
1) Class Warfare( Alinsky/Lucifer)
2) Race Warfare( see above)
3) Immorality war( see parentheses in #1)
Godzilla:
1)( so far) Gun Control via UN, Obama and now congress.


33 posted on 04/10/2013 9:41:21 AM PDT by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

BTTT


34 posted on 04/10/2013 9:45:17 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“America needs a, “spiritual cleansing of the people” .

Will only happen after a national calamity that brings much death, hellfire and brimstone.


35 posted on 04/10/2013 9:51:38 AM PDT by Rebelbase (1929-1950's, 20+years for full recovery. How long this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Agreed. He says some great things if you don’t listen too closely. That’s why I say he’s right about needing a spiritual cleansing and leave it at that.


36 posted on 04/10/2013 9:54:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

we are in the later parts of those steps indeed


37 posted on 04/10/2013 9:55:24 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Well, I think there are moral issues that no law will be able to fix but there's no reason why a political leader can't also have some impact in moral issues that really the law may not be able to fix but maybe by me saying that the marriage unit, the marriage unit, the family unit is an important structure, it's been with us for thousands of years and we shouldn't give up on that."

Then why is he for homosexual marriage?

38 posted on 04/10/2013 9:56:30 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I’d settle for just Congress at this point.


39 posted on 04/10/2013 9:58:10 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
From Rand Paul's official Web site:

"The U.S. welfare system sure creates some crazy disincentives to working your way up the ladder. Benefits stacked upon benefits can mean it is financially better, at least in the short term, to stay at a lower-paying jobs rather than taking a higher paying job and losing those benefits."

40 posted on 04/10/2013 9:58:49 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

He’s trying to bridge the (perhaps) unbridgeable gap between libertarians and traditional-values conservatives. Each one, if taken to its extreme, eliminates the other. Possibly each side must give way for a candidate to harness both sides. But then you could have the result we used to call “falling between two stools”—nobody wins.


41 posted on 04/10/2013 10:01:59 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

He’s not wrong! And part of that would be getting rid of the
politicians who are giving the opposition over to the bad guys!


42 posted on 04/10/2013 10:03:39 AM PDT by LUV W (All my heroes wear camos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

“He’s trying to bridge the (perhaps) unbridgeable gap between libertarians and traditional-values conservatives.”

Reagan did it.

Bush destroyed that coalition with his spending spree and now Rand Paul is trying to piece it back together.


43 posted on 04/10/2013 10:10:02 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

To take Rand Paul seriously, is to reject him. There is no other course, if you are a serious person.


44 posted on 04/10/2013 10:12:38 AM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Yes, sweep all those thugs and skanks out of D.C.


45 posted on 04/10/2013 10:16:13 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn5:4-5,4:15,5:13;Mt27:50-54,Mk15:33-34,Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tim2:5-6;Ti3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Sen. Rand Paul clarifies remarks on abortion, confirms he is 100% pro-life

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/sen.-rand-paul-clarifies-remarks-on-abortion-confirms-he-is-100-pro-life/


46 posted on 04/10/2013 10:17:19 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Then why is he for homosexual marriage?

He's not. Can you show us a link that supports your claim?

47 posted on 04/10/2013 10:20:06 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

He can’t, because it’s a lie. The Bushbots are out in full force.


48 posted on 04/10/2013 10:28:00 AM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Then why is he for homosexual marriage?

He's NOT!

Rand Paul Says Gay Marriage Debate Should Continue At The State Level
49 posted on 04/10/2013 10:40:13 AM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
The Bushbots are out in full force.

That would be JebBushbots?

50 posted on 04/10/2013 10:55:53 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson