Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Hold Senate Majority, Democrats Target the Most Conservative States in the Country
National Journal ^ | March 29, 2013 | Michael Catalini

Posted on 04/01/2013 5:52:43 PM PDT by neverdem

With races concentrated in Republican states, party officials are aggressively courting moderate candidates.

When Ashley Judd announced she wasn’t running for the Senate, Republicans greeted the news with glee, sending out a list of 10 other Democratic recruits uninterested in running against Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. But privately, leading Democratic officials were also cheering. Most viewed the liberal actress’s decision as good news for their chances in Kentucky, allowing a more-moderate candidate, such as Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, to run instead.

The efforts to woo a moderate Democrat to defeat McConnell are part of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee’s plans to compete in the most inhospitable territory for Democrats -- for open seats in Georgia, South Dakota, West Virginia, and possibly, even in Kentucky against the powerful and well-funded Senate minority leader. Facing a challenging political landscape in 2014, the party is close to landing credible candidates in all of those states.

The DSCC doesn’t divulge details about its recruitment strategy, arguing that many of the media reports about its preferred candidates are hogwash. But it’s clear that, in the spirit of former Chairman Chuck Schumer, it is playing an active role behind-the-scenes to ensure that electable Democrats emerge as nominees.

Already the committee is boasting that Georgia is their best pickup opportunity; the field of Republican candidates there for the seat of retiring Sen. Saxby Chambliss currently looks underwhelming. Moderate Rep. John Barrow, one of the few Democrats who could put the seat in play, now sounds as open as ever to running.

In West Virginia, party officials are excited about the looming candidacy of lawyer Nick Preservati, a first-time candidate who is planning to distance himself from national Democratic positions on energy and run in the mold of popular Sen. Joe Manchin. Preservati has family ties to the coal industry, which could defang attacks from Republicans eager to tie the nominee to the White House’s environmental regulations.

And in South Dakota, party officials are working to avoid a potential primary between two well-known Democrats: U.S. Attorney Brendan Johnson, the son of Sen. Tim Johnson, and former Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, who proved her bipartisan appeal, winning statewide elections to the House from 2004 to 2010. The committee won’t talk about what it’s doing, but South Dakota Democratic Party Chairman Ben Nesselhuf said he expects the party to coalesce behind one Democrat and avoid a messy primary.

“It’s [finding] a candidate who’s in line with their state and will do what’s best for the people of their state,” said Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spokesman Justin Barasky. “The main point is that Democrats know how to win in red states.”

To be sure, Democrats start out as underdogs in all four of these red-state races and may end up struggling to compete in any of them. But given that Republicans need to net six Senate seats to take the majority, even one upset victory behind enemy lines would be crucial.

That’s what made the prospect of the party rallying behind Judd so at odds with the committee’s strategy. The DSCC was publicly noncommittal about her potential candidacy, even after meeting with her and without any other candidates actively looking to run. In the run-up to the 2012 election, the committee never hesitated to telegraph its support for favored candidates, even if they faced the prospect of a primary. And only after Judd announced she wasn't running before the committee released a radio ad blasting McConnell -- a signal they expect to aggressively contest the race, but with Grimes or a moderate candidate better suited to the Kentucky electorate.

The Democratic activity in deeply conservative states stands in contrast, at least for now, to the lack of GOP movement against three Democratic senators in battleground states. Sens. Al Franken of Minnesota, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, and Mark Udall of Colorado have no announced Republican opponents – even though all represent states where Obama won less than 53 percent of the vote in 2012.

"The DSCC is getting used to having tough cycles in terms of the map," Barasky said, "but if you look at the math, the path to six for [Republicans] is daunting." 


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
They could try posing as "moderates" in the past. How can they pull that off after Obama's 2nd Inaugural Address?
1 posted on 04/01/2013 5:52:43 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Low information voters.


2 posted on 04/01/2013 5:55:23 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is why the eight gangbangers are trying so hard to get the BIG Business clowns and the BIG union thugs to pass amnesty quickly. To heck with the American taxpayers. Full speed ahead down the FreeWay to Amnesty!


3 posted on 04/01/2013 5:59:52 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The GOP will never get another cent or vote from me. Thanks to the eight gangbangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Gotta love the news media publicity machine. Yeah, Democrats are moderates. Sure they are.


4 posted on 04/01/2013 6:00:21 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Dem’s will lose their AND in many Purple states where they’re pulling Gun Control via extreme legislation.


5 posted on 04/01/2013 6:04:25 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You know what’s coming.

Macaca, Akins and Mourdock.... Oh my


6 posted on 04/01/2013 6:07:16 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

We’ve GOT to get these Tea Party guys thru some type of boot camp to teach them how to deal with the journ-0-lists.


7 posted on 04/01/2013 6:10:00 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I don’t know if it matters anymore.

What stupid things they don’t say, the media makes up anyway.

and the lie goes around the world before the truth gets it’s pants on.


8 posted on 04/01/2013 6:15:28 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: digger48
I don’t know if it matters anymore.

Indiana where I live is a good example of it mattering.

Murdoch ran 10 points behind Romney and 6 points behind Pence (governor) and lost.

9 posted on 04/01/2013 6:38:49 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Low information voters probably think that Republicans already control the Senate.


10 posted on 04/01/2013 8:39:05 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The GOP should easily win all four of these seats, whether it’s a mid-term or Presidential year. Don’t underestimate the ability of the GOP to nominate losers. Whether it’s Tea Party/grassroots backed conservatives, or establishment-pick duds, the GOP has thrown away nearly 10 Senate seats in 2010 and 2012.

And how can the GOP not have anybody wanting to take on Franken? Is he that popular? What is Tim Pawlenty doing?


11 posted on 04/01/2013 8:40:49 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“McConnell” needs to be primaried OUT.


12 posted on 04/01/2013 9:28:42 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

Judd is sure better to look at than Alison Lundergan Grimes.

When her hair is pulled back she looks like she belongs in the Kentucky derby. /mean sexist remark


13 posted on 04/02/2013 11:57:50 PM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson