Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Fungi pull carbon into northern forest soils
1 posted on 03/31/2013 5:37:27 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

The climate change endgame is 1/2 a billion people on the entire planet, with a collectivist government running the show. If it’s in sight, we have a problem.


2 posted on 03/31/2013 5:43:52 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

To say nothing of young trees sucking in CO2 like teenage boys cleaning out the refrigerator. Cut more trees, mill lumber, build stuff and sequester more carbon!


3 posted on 03/31/2013 5:46:03 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I suspect this “religion” is planted so deeply it can’t be eradicated. The average USA 20-something knows far more about global warming than the US Constitution.


4 posted on 03/31/2013 5:48:18 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Eventually the climate modeling community is going to have to reconsider the central question: Have the models the IPCC uses for its predictions of catastrophic warming overestimated the climate’s sensitivity to greenhouse gases?

What's the IPCC stand for...International Perps of Climatetheory Chaos?

7 posted on 03/31/2013 6:13:44 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
the claim that Himalayan glaciers were in danger of melting as soon as 2035. That such an outlandish claim would be so readily accepted is a sign of the credulity of the climate campaign and the media: -- quote from the full article

And yet billions and billions in fraudulent grant dollars have been awarded to academic charlatans who seized on this charade to personally enrich themselves and their universities. And what about all the disbelieving true scientists who had their reputations destroyed, their careers shattered and, in many instances, their jobs terminate? Who pays for that? I would start with a never ending stream of lawsuits against the Wunderkind of global warming, that Nobel Prize winning Hollywood actor and producer, Al Gore.

8 posted on 03/31/2013 6:18:09 PM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

There will be a new environmental catastrophe to replace global warming.

Just wait and see.


11 posted on 03/31/2013 6:52:40 PM PDT by WildWeasel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Here is a response I got from DR. Jeff Masters at Weather Underground a couple of weeks ago when we traded a few emails after a response to one of his blog posts. I was commenting on his extreme left wing point of view of a movie that demonized the Koch brothers. I can post more of the exchange if anybody is interested. This response was inreference to me telling him the Sun was resposible for global warming...

From: jeff.masters@weather.com [mailto:jeff.masters@weather.com]

If it were the sun were responsible for global warming, we would expect to see the most heating occurring during the daytime hours and during the summer, when the sun is at its strongest. Yet the greatest warming has occurred at night and in the winter months. If the sun were responsible for global warming, we would expect the entire column of the atmosphere to warm, not just the surface. Instead, we observe that the upper atmosphere--the stratosphere and mesosphere--is cooling, while the surface is warming. These observed trends--great heating in winter and at night, and cooling in the upper atmosphere while the surface is warming--are what climate change theory says should happen if heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide are responsible for the warming, and don't fit the idea that the sun is doing it. We also have satellite measurements of the total amount of solar energy arriving at the top of Earth's atmosphere from satellites since 1979, and these measurements show a slight decrease in solar energy during 1979 - 2012. In fact, Earth's warmest year on record--2010--occurred during a period where the satellite-measured incoming solar energy was near an all-time low, probably much lower than anything that has occurred for centuries. So, while it is natural to suspect the sun as the source of global warming, "if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"

He quit responding to my emails when I asked him why then during the Paleozic and Mesozoic periods CO2 levels ranged from 2500 to 7000 ppm and life thrived and temps held a steady average never rising above 26 degrees Celsius. And right now CO2 levels are around 400 ppm. Whats the big problem? The left's arguement does not make logical sense...

Crickets ever since...prior to that he responded 3 or 4 times.

12 posted on 03/31/2013 6:56:13 PM PDT by BreezyDog (Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

http://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/strategy.php

Somebody better tell the current Administration
They are still going whole-hog


21 posted on 03/31/2013 7:48:19 PM PDT by libertarian27 (FreeRepublic Cookbooks 2011 & 2012 - Click Profile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Best we can hope for is they will start saying that a new Ice Age is coming and it's the fault of human beings.

The solution will be the same solution as for global warming.

Global warming was just an excuse to abolish private property rights and impose totalitarian socialism.

The next manufactured crisis will also be an excuse to abolish private property rights and impose totalitarian socialism.

22 posted on 03/31/2013 7:59:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“That this appears in The Economist is significant, because this august British news organ has been fully on board with climate alarmism for years now.”

The economist used to be an “august” British puplication, and fairly unbiased, and I was a subscriber.

Then it moved its main base of operations to Sixth Avenue in Manhattan and gradually its pages more and more resembled NewsSpeak and Time in the political orientation of its editors and writing.

I first ended my subscription and after a few attempts to see what was happending between it’s covers I quit buying it on the newsstand.

It always had one great editorial flaw. Like the writers of the publications of Jehovah’s witnesses, most of its articles were published without sighting a single reporter or author.


44 posted on 04/02/2013 4:54:56 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson