Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

When gay marriage is legal, marriage will mean nothing.


69 posted on 03/28/2013 9:57:23 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pallis

“When gay marriage is legal, marriage will mean nothing.”

Uh...for too many this point has been reached already. And may be that, in part, accounts for why we’re at where we’re at.


96 posted on 03/28/2013 10:59:07 AM PDT by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: pallis
When gay marriage is legal, marriage will mean nothing.

I agree, same with citizenship after illegals get their amnesty.

97 posted on 03/28/2013 11:00:18 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: pallis
Ding Ding Ding!

We have a winner!

Actually I prefer the correct term - same sex marriage, because that is what all the fuss is about.

Marriage will certainly mean nothing in the future, either morally, societally or legally.

Why shouldn't a mother be allowed to “marry” her adult daughter or granddaughter, or a father marry his adult son or grandson, since they obviously can't reproduce?
One presumes they all LOVE one another.
And whether or not they have “sex”, or what kind of sex they enjoy is none of societies business, is it?

Think of all the wonderfull financial benefits such arrangements could result in for each “married” couple!
That whole inheritance tax concept could be thrown out the window in one fell swoop!

And really, would it be “fair” if Grandma can marry a granddaughter, but not her grandson?
Since marriage doesn't mean anything but legal LOVE, what about the poor grandma that only has grandsons?

If you think I am attempting to be facetious, you are wrong.

Individual homosexuals have never been legally forbidden marriage.
They can currently legally marry any adult of the opposite sex, with at least two degrees of familial biological separation.
That “legal separation” was meant to protect society as a whole from incestuous inbreeding, and also to avoid dynastic and progressively mentally dysfunctional accumulations of power and property

But hey, with legal same sex marriage, inbreeding would no longer be an issue, so mother/daughter, father/son, Uncle/nephew,same sex siblings, first cousins etc...all logically should have the same absolute “right” to marry.

Who can argue against their “love” ?

104 posted on 03/28/2013 6:06:24 PM PDT by sarasmom (The obvious takes longer to discover for the obtuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson