[DoodleDawg]

A California creationist is offering a $10,000 challenge to anyone who can prove in front of a judge that science contradicts the literal interpretation of the book of Genesis.

Presenting evidence that the Earth is older than 6,000 years should win it I would think.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “Presenting evidence that the Earth is older than 6,000 years should win it I would think.” <<

.
If there were any, but that’s the hitch; its all imagination.

[Moonman62]

Presenting evidence that the Earth is older than 6,000 years should win it I would think.

Magnetic striping of the oceans, and the lengthier ice cores should do it.

[ifinnegan]

Presenting evidence that the Earth is older than 6,000 years should win it I would think.

No, because no one would be able to prove the Bible states the Earth is only 6000 years old.

[upsdriver]

Presenting evidence that the Earth is older than 6,000 years should win it I would think.

Where in the book of Genesis does it state the Earth is 6000 years old?

[Tublecane]

There are enough logical problems without bringing science into it. Did you ever wonder, for instance, how they can trace Jesus’ lineage back to King David through Joseph considering it was a “virgin birth”? But this guy would probably say Hid can suspend the rules of logic just like he suspended the laws of physics so that the earth stopped turning on its axis without catastrophe.