Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk

“I believe multiple theories should be presented to the student.”

That is perfectly reasonable for studies in philosophy and theology, but is contradictory to natural sciencce and the scientific method of experimentation and observation of results.


54 posted on 03/27/2013 12:22:27 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX
That is perfectly reasonable for studies in philosophy and theology, but is contradictory to natural sciencce and the scientific method of experimentation and observation of results.

So you would be in favor of presenting any evidence, whether it supports a current scientific theory or not, as long as its scientific evidence?

63 posted on 03/27/2013 12:37:37 PM PDT by dartuser (My firearm is not illegal ... its undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

That could be said about macro evolution as well. It is philosophy. There is little science to speak of. What they have deals with micro evolution. But I am ok with presenting what they have ... As long as other competing theories are presented.

But that is how it is with liberals, global warming advocates and evolutionists and academic blowhards. They don’t want debate or discusion and just want to indoctrinate children wth their beliefs. Screw them. That sort of monopolistic thinking pervades colleges and is a large part of our problem on the political scene.


97 posted on 03/27/2013 1:44:19 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson