[zeugma]

I’m sorry, but using the term “oral arguments’ when discussing faggots is not exactly kosher IMO.

[lbryce]

That was the gist of the article verbatim. I hadn't notice the very subtle pun on the subject but it was very observant of you to notice.

On the other hand, considering the issues at stake,we are on the very very verge of a new "neologistic legal term" differentiating prcotological RAM-ifications of homosexual rights versus oral arguments of the same, that may be a lot closer to coming to fruition (the same way a fruit arrives at that pointt) than you might think.

Gay rights are definitely expanding the legal ramifications of human rights to the stretching point. Any coincidence in the use of the language regarding this subject is absolutely intentional.