Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Why can’t I marry my brother and/or sister, and not consumate the marriage” We could save money on taxes.


3 posted on 03/26/2013 4:24:03 PM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: forgotten man
Why not a man and a boy?

Why not a man and a goat?

Ask these questions of any pro-gay marriage supporter, and you'll find out that they indeed have a line, just as you do. They just disagree where the line should be drawn.

4 posted on 03/26/2013 4:29:16 PM PDT by IncPen (Mayor Bloomberg doesn't fear government tyranny; he is government tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forgotten man

All the arguments for gay marriage are emotional pablum, and of course they can apply to all kinds of unusual relationships.

Why can’t we have polygamy? If we have say, a guy and 2 girls, the gay rights movement should be happy because the women can be bisexual and everyone can have one big party.

And won’t a child be so lucky to have a father and two mothers?

Once you let the left bitch slap you with their arguments, we are through the looking glass. That’s why you needed to stand up to them at the beginning.

No, it will not be good if we allow gays to marry and adopt so a kid is raised knowing he has two “fathers” who put their penises in each other’s rectums. It’s just absurd. But hey, they “love” each other. Ok, good for them enjoy it but leave society alone.


5 posted on 03/26/2013 4:32:48 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forgotten man

If you don’t consummate, it’s not a marriage.


9 posted on 03/26/2013 4:36:53 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forgotten man
If Gay Marriage is ruled Constitutional, every State that has Laws against Incestuous Relationships will have to void those Laws. After all, it's about Love...

Remember the heat that Scalia got when he said the decision to rule the Texas Law against Sodomy Law as Unconstitutional would be a slippery slope?

55 posted on 03/26/2013 10:40:14 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Compliance with Tyranny is Treason...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: forgotten man

You are right (under the argument made by the left). Who says love has to be romantic/physical love? How about platonic love? Brotherly love? Since marriage is no longer about procreation and family, all bets are off.


61 posted on 03/27/2013 6:25:00 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson