If I could afford it, I'd have one of these in my backyard...and I am experienced in their deployment, having commanded two platoons of Chaparral systems.
Drones beware!!!
Posted on 03/14/2013 8:51:03 AM PDT by Perdogg
Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein had this explosive exchange at a Senate Judiciary Hearing on guns earlier today:
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
Rights are absolute. The Dem senators don’t understand the meaning of rights.
Thanks. There is an essay I wrote to go with the video.
“Democide: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom”
http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/bracken-democide/
“...I knew you would love it....”
I love when ANYONE bitch-slaps the likes of DiFi or Chuck Schumer publically and makes them expose themselves for the pieces of sh*t that they are.
“...Morning Joe ...”
Joe Scarborough isn’t even worth the breath it takes to say his name out loud. He’s a turncoat, and made his bed. He can stay in it.
Cruz, Rand Paul, LtC West - these are the people that are making the left lose what little minds they have left. Their hatred of these gentlemen is telling.
So yeah, you are correct SOL, I’m loving it. We do in fact have people speaking up for us. It’s about damned time.
“..Dem senators don’t understand the meaning of rights...”
Oh, they understand the meaning all right. They just don’t give a rat’s *ss about your rights.
Their interpretation is that we only the “rights” (read that “permission” in their mentality) that THEY decide we should have.
Free men don’t ask permission from their Public SERVANTS.
F*** ‘em. Always, every way, and every where.
If Leahy hates Texas (he obviously does and how childish is THAT?), then all I can say is, WE’RE GOOD!
You're welcome.
If I could afford it, I'd have one of these in my backyard...and I am experienced in their deployment, having commanded two platoons of Chaparral systems.
Drones beware!!!
Mika applied the adjective "criminal" to Senator Cruz this morning. She needs to cut back on her steroids.
Do you think you will see this on the 6 o’clock news ?
Something I didn’t know . . the ‘roots’ of the NRA . . .
I bet Obama and Holder didn’t expect this!!
http://www.youtube.com/embed/9RABZq5IoaQ?feature=player_embedded
Uh, hate to do this but, Boxer is gone, you say? And you hope DiFi is gone soon, too? Sorry, but Boxer is still there. What made you think she was gone?
I would advise NOT watching that show if you are going to take them seriously, they are on a anti-gun Jihad.
I never see 2nd Amendment guests on the show debating them, they would be well outnumbered if they did.
Jim DeMint went on to annouce his new Heritage job when this gun thing was burning back in January and he completely avoided the subject when Mika baited him on it. He said something like “We all agree that ...bla-bla-bla’ and moved on.
“None of these rights are absolute. None of them.”
Our trip down the rabbit hole picks up speed. I wish the clip had continued. Am off to read down thread, and get looking for Cruz’ response to that one!
Dear Lord, guide our course.
Tatt
Amen!
Dear Lord, strengthen us in these perilous times.
Tatt
Thanks for the link PLD.
BTTT
http://www.youtube.com/embed/9RABZq5IoaQ?feature=player_embedded
Dear Lord, guide our course.
Tatt
Thank you!
According to Mark Levin, he didn’t blow an argument. AT ALL.
What she did was change the subject to something that had nothing at all to do with what Cruz asked. And when Durbin chimed in to help her, he was talking out his “you know what”.
According to Levin, the Bill of Rights was put there so the heavy hand of government power couldn’t take power away from the citizens. When she brought up child porn as an exception to the First Amendment’s free speech right, she changed the subject to something else, since the right of free speech meant POLITICAL SPEECH to those who put the BofR into the Constitution.
He repeated on his show last night, child porn has nothing to do with this. Nothing. NOTHING.
It isn’t Ted Cruz’s fault that she thought it DID. All she did was prove how ignorant she is.
Cruz pointed out later, when he had his time to do so, that she never did answer his question he put to her. And under that pressure, she finally answered and said “No” (It wouldn’t be consitutional for the Senate to list certain books that would be prohibited from First Amendment protection.)
The formula Cruz used was to exactly parallel her list of specific guns that won’t be allowed under the Second Amendment. By asking if the same exact thing would be ok if done to the First Amendment (ban certain books) or the Fourth Amendment (name people who COULD be searched without due process etc).
She became utterly “discumbobulated” and rambled all over the place. Not a word she said in her diatribe had ANYTHING to do with his point.
You can’t “game out” liberal’s rantings. They will always get into an emotional rant and throw everything up against the wall.
Mark Levin led his show with Cruz, and praised him to the utmost throughout the show. He said it’s now a new day. These “old bulls” in the Senate now know they will be challenged and will not be given a free pass anymore. Cruz will do it consistently and will not back down.
And I will add, she made herself look like a raving lunatic who shouldn’t be allowed to own a gun, herself. Much less be a Senator trying to ram this stuff down the throats of Americans.
This was sent to me by an email friend and I had to share it..Notice how respectful these men and women are..Not loud mouths like the ones under Obama..These are true Americans..that are educated with class..
That made my hair stand on end.
Yup. It’s not the weapon that makes a man a criminal. A criminal will possess all the weapons he chooses, legal or not. Obviously, gun control laws are no hindrance to criminals. Just as the constitution is no hindrance to the criminally stupid statist control freaks in the government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.