Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Sugar Intake Behind The Rise In Type 2 Diabetes
redOrbit ^ | February 28, 2013 | Lawrence LeBlond

Posted on 03/07/2013 2:18:50 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/07/2013 2:18:52 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Sorry, but I don’t trust anything about of California liberal bastions.


2 posted on 03/07/2013 2:22:06 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Sounds like they are laying the ground work for massive lawsuits against Big sugar and to impose taxes to help fund socialist medicine.


3 posted on 03/07/2013 2:25:37 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Sugar Association also found fault with Lustig’s study, saying it failed to separate the effects of “natural sugar” and high-fructose corn syrup.

There is the answer ....high-fructose corn syrup.

4 posted on 03/07/2013 2:32:35 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yet all these many years I thought people were being scolded to and actually WERE attempting to “eat healthy”. I find this hard to believe. Lord knows that’s 1 of the big propaganda things of the last 20+ years, and indoctrination of kids hoping somehow they’ll actually think celery tastes better than Oreos.


5 posted on 03/07/2013 2:32:45 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Has anybody ever done a study on a possible correlation of the rise in obesity, type II diabetes, high blood pressure, kidney failure, alcoholism, and drug dependance WITH THE INCREASE OF THE NUMBER OF WELFARE AND BOGUS DISABILITY RECIPIENTS? How about a study on the increase in physical and mental STRESS on working, tax-paying Americans forced to support the above mentioned.
6 posted on 03/07/2013 2:33:28 PM PST by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Poorly refined Carbohydrates are the real problem.


7 posted on 03/07/2013 2:41:52 PM PST by HChampagne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

“..high-fructose corn syrup. “

That’s what my doc said did it to me. I’ve controlled it with my diet, which has always been pretty good. But,,,, I don’t like soda pop, so I’d buy and drink fruit juices by the half gallon, thinking, “Hey! It’s fruit juice! It’s gotta be good for me!” Unfortunately, I didn’t realize the High Frucktose Corn Syrup was bad ju ju. I cut that cr@p out, and with my Asian-style diet, I’m only slightly above high normal, and don’t have to take meds.


8 posted on 03/07/2013 2:46:34 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I suspect the truth is a bit more round about. That is, while sugar may indeed be to blame, it is because the gut bacteria that prosper most on sugar is a genus called enterobacter, whose toxin *causes* weight gain directly.

That is, if you had a better combination of gut bacteria, you could eat a lot more sugar without ill effects, your metabolism adjusting to it, except you would make your gut environment such that it favored enterobacter.

It has been shown in recent experiments that morbidly obese people had, instead of 30-40 primary dominant types of gut bacteria, almost 1/3rd of their gut bacteria was enterobacter. And when enterobacter toxin was injected into mice they bloated up in short order on the same diet.

Then they took morbidly obese people and put them on an anti-enterobacter diet, with *no* exercise, and they shed about 1/3rd of their overweight with no decrease in total calories.


9 posted on 03/07/2013 2:56:12 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

What is an anti-enterobacter diet?


10 posted on 03/07/2013 2:58:52 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: July4

Good questions.


11 posted on 03/07/2013 3:00:58 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HChampagne
Poorly refined Carbohydrates are the real problem.

High refined, I think you mean. Anything that causes insulin spikes I suspect.. I hesitate to separate one substance and demonize it (like HFCS), because then we stop paying attention to the others that might be doing harm as well. So I think its all the cheap and easy carbs we are eating that is the carbs.

For the vast majority of human history, carbs used to have a large cost. They were difficult to digest, and or difficult to come by (fruits). Now, they are cheap and easy, both digestively and economically.

12 posted on 03/07/2013 3:30:25 PM PST by Paradox (Unexpected things coming for the next few years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: austinmark; FreedomCalls; IslandJeff; JRochelle; MarMema; Txsleuth; Newtoidaho; texas booster; ...
Diabetes Reversal In Mice Via Stem Cells

Oral minocycline for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME): results of a phase I/II clinical study.

I stumbled into that second link doing a search about tetracycline antibiotics and the immune system.

FReepmail me if you want on or off the diabetes ping list.

13 posted on 03/07/2013 3:37:10 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

So the cause is not global warming?


14 posted on 03/07/2013 4:13:13 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Unfortunately the original paper just specified “whole grains and Chinese herbs”, along with probiotics.

(*) Indicates enterobacter genus:

There are related diets for species of genus enterobacter, however, such as a low starch diet against the Klebsiella enterobacter(*), found in abundance with those who have ankylosing spondylitis. A “low starch diet” involving a reduced intake of “bread, potatoes, cakes and pasta”.

Grapefruit Seed Extract (GSE). Lab testing has shown it to be effective against a long list of microorganisms including Giardia lamblia, Proteus vulgaris(*), E.coli(*), Aspergillus parasiticus, Salmonella typhi(*) and Staphylococcus aureus.

GSE is especially useful where infecting microbe cannot be determined as it is effective against such a wide range of pathogens. Another advantage is that it is effective for controlling diarrhea. GSE generally comes in either capsules, good if you can’t stand the taste) or in liquid concentrate form. As low a dose as 2-4 drops in 4oz water or juice twice daily can be effective.

Studies have found garlic to be effective in combatiing infections with bacillus, brucella, citrobacter(*), E.coli(*), hafnia(*), klebsiella(*), Salmonella typhi(*), shigella(*), Vibrio cholerae and various species of staph and strep.

Research has shown that ginger possesses inhibitory action against a variety of pathogenic bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus, E.coli(*), Salmonella(*) and Steptococcus viridans. Also of benefit in treating bacterial dysbiosis is the fact that ginger acts as a prebiotic, encouraging the growth of friendly bacteria like Lactobacilli sp.


15 posted on 03/07/2013 4:16:28 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Thank you very much. We're low carb, and use ginger and garlic quite a bit. We do not use GSE, but I will be doing something about that now.

Thanks again!

16 posted on 03/07/2013 4:30:56 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

and then there is 70...... the age factor

The ordinary watching carbohydrates and sweets, exercise and weight loss........ no longer obese, don’t seem to control the A1C at a physician acceptable level.

I am now to take metformin after years of non drug control


17 posted on 03/07/2013 5:31:30 PM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Diabetes is up since they lowered the threshold.


18 posted on 03/07/2013 6:04:49 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Soylent Green is Boomers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; editor-surveyor; little jeremiah
But a new finding by three California universities – Stanford, UC-Berkeley and UCSF – suggests through compelling evidence that Type 2 diabetes is being largely driven by the rising consumption of sugary foods and drinks. This evidence comes in the form of large-scale analysis of worldwide sugar availability over the last decade. The findings have been published in Wednesday’s (Feb. 27) issue of the journal PLoS ONE.

The natural health people have been saying this for decades now and it goes to prove that although they are poo-pooed by the medical community, as they almost always are, they are right again, as they almost always are.

At the very least, they have a better track record than the medical community.

19 posted on 03/07/2013 7:28:19 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Actually, this ‘finding’ is known to be wrong!

The largest contribution to type 2 diabetes is artificial fats like margarine, and polyunsaturated fats.

These fats, when used by our cells to form the cell membrane, result in a cell that cannot admit sugar to be metabolized, thus leaving the sugar in the blood stream to be converted to fat and stored in the upper body.

The most noticeable result of all this is weight gain, but it also over-works the pancreas to produce excess insulin, and may be a factor in cancer of the pancreas and liver.

More information on this can be found at http://www.cancertutor.com/Diabetes/Diabetes_Type_II.htm

Not that all the sugar we consume is a good thing, since it will feed any malignant cells that may be in our bodies, and contributes to low blood ph, which also contributes to cancer.


20 posted on 03/07/2013 9:10:45 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson