Posted on 03/04/2013 7:52:21 PM PST by xzins
The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote Thursday on a bipartisan gun safety measure designed to curb illegal gun trafficking and purchasing.
The bill, which would toughen the penalties for those who purchase a gun illegally for others to up to 15 years and make gun trafficking a felony, has attracted the most bipartisan support so far of four measures headed for the committee.
The measure is a marriage of a gun-trafficking bill designed by Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the committee, and a similar bill that was being put together between Senators Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, and Mark Steven Kirk, Republican of Illinois. It will be co-sponsored by Senators Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, and Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut.
Most significantly, the bill has received intense interest from Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, who has a strong rating from the National Rifle Association.
A proposal to reinstate an assault weapons ban, which would also ban certain high-capacity magazines, is unlikely to attract Republican votes and would have almost no chance of passing the full Senate, should it even get out of the committee.
The absence of any federal law defining gun trafficking as a crime in this country is shocking, Ms. Gillibrand said in a statement. She added: By cracking down on straw purchasers, illegal gun traffickers and their vast criminal networks, we can stop the flow of illegal guns and reduce gun crime. I look forward to working with all of our colleagues on both side of the aisle to pass this important piece of legislation.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...
Gifts are supposedly exempt.
I wonder if the bill is retroactive. Maybe that’s why Grassley likes it. Holder should go to prison for not more than 20 years.
Bad! but not a single congress critter on our side has enough sense to see the consequences of giving the gubment power to intercede in gun transactions!
this is crap. we have enough laws. If they aren’t prosecuting the existing law, what do we need new ones for?
Depending on who is in power, it could be worse than that, demshateGod.
Any transaction could be questioned and then you’d have to prove that you weren’t breaking the law. Even if they didn’t fine or convict you, they could still cost you enormous amounts of time and legal fees.
It’s certainly intended to maximize their power and limit our freedom.
You are exactly right about that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.