[Travis McGee]

[Diogenesis]

[The_Media_never_lie]

If you don’t report this way, you’ll regret it.....

[theBuckwheat]

Doesn’t that also imply an obligation to report when they are wrong? But it never seems to work out that way, does it?

[From The Deer Stand]

Oh poor Harry. Senility is a bad thing.

[Venturer]

If the Media were not owned and operated by the Media harry Reid would be a joke.

The sequestration was Obama’s idea. A Democrat idea.

If they don’;t like the result they should not have come up with the idea.

Saying the American people want Republicans to continue us into deeper and deeper debt is BS Harry, and you know it.

[cripplecreek]

Or what?

[Paladin2]

Dear Hairy:

Pass a budget, you dipweed.

[Smokin' Joe]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

He's serious???

[Buckeye McFrog]

translation: The bill on my desk to provide a Federal bailout for the dead tree newspaper industry ain’t seeing the light of day until you all do what you’re told.

[allendale]

Who would have thought sequestration would be so cool? The Democrats are facing real spending cuts. Obama, Reid and Pelosi are screaming and nobody is being fooled with the threats. Hope the Republicans have learned a little about pulic relations and stay the course.

[NEMDF]

I was shocked to hear a reporter on NBC nightly news with Brian Williams, on Wednesday night, said that this whole sequester business is a “manufactured crisis”.

[G Larry]

Harry is such miserable little POS, there is no point in writing his office.

What is needed is a very public rebuttal, slamming his lies.

This needs to occur on a very regular basis.

[usconservative]

I don’t know of a single person that I’ve talked to lately, Republican or Democrat that’s against the sequester. Most believe its the ONLY WAY to cut government spending and start reigning in the all intrusive government behemoth.

In short, they’re saying enough is enough and start cutting already. They’ve had to do it in their family budgets and don’t understand why the government refuses to cut anything at all.

I think we may have finally reached the tipping point on government spending.

[dfwgator]

How Goebbels of him.

[mbarker12474]

... or you will regret it.

[trebb]

Harry and Nancy are examples of the insane emperors back in the days of sweethearts like Caligula. Back then they had the excuse of not knowing that storing wine in lead containers to make it taste sweeter would also make you nuts...

[The Great RJ]

Big Brother’s Ministry of Truth may be crumbling. Joe better doubleplusquick get the masses back to doublethink.

[Eagle of Liberty]

“This isn’t something that happened yesterday, we’ve been fighting this for a couple years,” Reid added.

Senator Reid's Track Record on Spending:

FY 2008:
Revenue - $2524 Billion
Spending - $2982 Billion
Surplus or Deficit - $458 Billion DEFICIT

FY 2009:
Revenue - $2105 Billion
Spending - $3518 Billion
Surplus or Deficit - $1413 Billion DEFICIT

FY 2010:
Revenue - $2163 Billion
Spending - $3456 Billion
Surplus or Deficit - $1293 Billion DEFICIT

FY 2011:
Revenue - $2304 Billion
Spending - $3603 Billion
Surplus or Deficit - $1299 Billion DEFICIT

So over those four years of Pelosi and Reid's Congressional Leadership, they signed off on $4463 BILLION of money that we did not have! They did this right in the middle of a recession. The most outlandish numbers? In FY 2009, we took in $2105 BILLION (The lowest amount since 2004). We KNEW this number, yet we spent $3518 BILLION!!! And NOW we need to "raise revenue" to reverse our situation? NO! All "raising more revenue" will do is provide an excuse for spending even more!!!

We currently have baseline budgeting which means whatever SPENDING was for the previous year, that is where the budget STARTS for the next year. I would be for one of two things to happen immediately.

1) Do away with baseline budgeting

2) At least use REVENUE instead of SPENDING for the baseline with a maximum of a 10% deficit.

[RetSignman]

Only members of the Communist Party could be elected to the various posts. Stalin controlled party membership, and thus chose those people who liked and supported him and his position. Although the constitution was supposed to be democratic, it is obvious that Stalin had the real power. Stalin and the Communist Party tried to make themselves look good by recognising the rights of the people to free medical care, to work, to education and political rights, such as freedom of speech and freedom of press. However, all these “freedoms” had to be expressed according to Stalin’s and the party’s wishes.