To: blam
It is only a “precedent” in that idiot circuit and surely it will be appealed, so it is not going to be standing.
2 posted on
02/25/2013 6:23:50 AM PST by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: yldstrk
To: yldstrk
It is only a “precedent” in that idiot circuit and surely it will be appealed, so it is not going to be standing.
This article was written by an advocate, presumably a non-lawyer. The suggestion that a ruling citing precedent is “bulletproofed” against a SCOTUS review is absurd, as ever appeals could ruling does this.
15 posted on
02/25/2013 6:45:46 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
To: yldstrk
I wonder what part of “shall not be infringed” they didn’t understand?
34 posted on
02/25/2013 7:49:00 AM PST by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: yldstrk
My prediction is it will go to the Supremes...you know how that worked with Obozocare.....
It begins, folks.....
To: yldstrk
and they now have a conflict with the 7th Circuit, so SCOTUS is going to have to pick one to decide.
89 posted on
02/25/2013 4:19:12 PM PST by
ClayinVA
("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson