It is only a precedent in that idiot circuit and surely it will be appealed, so it is not going to be standing.
This article was written by an advocate, presumably a non-lawyer. The suggestion that a ruling citing precedent is “bulletproofed” against a SCOTUS review is absurd, as ever appeals could ruling does this.
posted on 02/25/2013 6:45:46 AM PST
by Atlas Sneezed
(Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
yeah these people think “If I say it enough, may be they’ll believe it.” And “let’s run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes”
This “ruling” ain’t getting saluted.
posted on 02/25/2013 6:51:20 AM PST
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson