[Atlas Sneezed]

It is only a “precedent” in that idiot circuit and surely it will be appealed, so it is not going to be standing.

---

This article was written by an advocate, presumably a non-lawyer. The suggestion that a ruling citing precedent is “bulletproofed” against a SCOTUS review is absurd, as ever appeals could ruling does this.

[yldstrk]

yeah these people think “If I say it enough, may be they’ll believe it.” And “let’s run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes”

This “ruling” ain’t getting saluted.