Posted on 02/23/2013 12:43:22 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
Now that's funny.
This is what baffles me.
Name ONE instance where an abortion is necessary in the THIRD trimester to save the life of the mom?
Third trimester means that the baby is viable. It has to come out *somehow* (via vaginal birth or c-section). Why not let it live?
Even in the cases of hydrocephalus, the baby can be delivered via c-section. When my son was a year old, he became critically ill and we spent a month in a high-risk children’s ward. We came into contact with babies dying of hydrocephalus (which is worse than most people can imagine), cancer, and cystic fibrosis.
ALL of these babies were dearly loved and doted on by their parents.
I cannot think of ANYTHING that would result in the NECESSARY death of a third trimester baby.
Cuomo is a corrupt piece of garbage who thinks he knows better than everyone else. Him for president? Are you nuts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.