Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgia Legislators Propose Ending Direct Election of Senators—Why Not Just Get Rid of the Senate?
Mother Jones (yeah, I know, I know) ^ | February 15, 2013 | Tim Murphy

Posted on 02/17/2013 10:14:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It is a matter of public record that the United States Senate is a terrible place where serious policy issues are ignored; routine votes are occasionally delayed over concerns about non-existent terrorist groups; and proverbial cans are proverbially kicked down the proverbial road of sadness, gridlock, and despair.

What's less clear is why the Senate is such a congress of louts. Is it the endless pressure to raise money? The never-ending campaign? The fact that Americans hold lots of substantive disagreements on important things and are themselves—it's been said—somewhat dysfunctional?

Actually, according to Georgia state Rep. Buzz Brockaway, the biggest problem with the Senate is that it's democratically elected. Brockaway, a Republican, has introduced a bill in the state legislature to repeal the 17th Amendment, which provides for the direct election of senators, and instead restore the responsibility of choosing members to state legislatures (as was the process until 1913).

The bill, HR 273, laments that "the Seventeenth Amendment has resulted in a large federal government with power and control that cannot be checked by the states," and suggests that "the original purpose of the United States Senate was to protect the sovereignty of the states from the federal government and to give each individual state government representation in the federal legislative branch of government."

If the bill passed, Georgia would be the first state to endorse repealing the 17th Amendment, but the idea has gained traction among conservatives over the last few decades. Texas Gov. Rick Perry supports it; so do GOP Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and Jeff Flake of Arizona. (Republican Indiana Sen. candidate Richard Mourdock endorsed the idea during his campaign last year, before, in an ironic twist, losing the popular vote.) As Salon's Alex Seitz-Wald noted in 2012, conservatives blame the 17th Amendment for trampling over the rights of states by changing the constituency to which senators are accountable.

Of course, introducing a bill is the easy part. Getting voters to agree to give up their right to vote will probably be a tough sell.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; 17thamendment; 1913; buzzbrockaway; federalism; hr273; legislature; mikelee; repeal; resolution; richardmourdock; rickperry; senate; states; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Lazamataz

If my posts riled you up. You are there. I pronounce you trim, fit, and ready for action. Heck, I’m no officer Laz. Get back in here and lead. Hit it for all of us!


81 posted on 02/18/2013 4:18:32 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The concept of three branches of government is an old-fashioned idea dreamed up by a bunch of dead white men to hold on to their power over the oppressed.

A single person in charge of everything will streamline the process and totally remove gridlock and other barriers to progress.

/s


82 posted on 02/18/2013 4:19:06 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If I have to choose between the founding fathers and NicCarraway, I will choose Madison, Franklin etc. Don’t take it personally.


83 posted on 02/18/2013 4:26:29 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

How is your work on the “Why the 17th amendment is good for America” coming? Do you expect your vanity piece out soon? Waiting with keen anticipation for you to post it. Make sure you Freep Mail everyone so we don;t miss it. I will proof read it for you it you want.


84 posted on 02/18/2013 4:36:21 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Mr. Brockaway is my state representative.
What a co-ink-i-dink.


85 posted on 02/18/2013 4:37:10 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; fieldmarshaldj
Laz how are you doing on fieldmarshaldj posted thread? Am at the 100 level and this one is leaving me breathless, tired, and failing. Any success at your local?
86 posted on 02/18/2013 4:49:25 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All

The more I read the more I see and understand the title of Why Not Just Get Rid of the Senate. If the objective is to remove corruption and save our money forcing the House to do its original intent and write all spending legislation, why not, Get Rid of the Senate, and let the People’s House handle all legislation. For what We the People have presently, I have to believe the Founders would approve.


87 posted on 02/18/2013 5:01:33 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

“Perhaps that problem could be solved by requiring the first Senate seat to be appointed by the state assembly majority leader and the second seat appointed by the state assembly minority leader?”

That sounds like craven compromise to me and totally defeats the idea of repealing the 17th Amendment. We would be right back to the same city mouse/country mouse government we have now.

The idea is for citizens to elect their state legislatures. Republican legislatures will appoint Republican senators and vice versa. If a state likes progressive govt. so be it. People will vote with their feet.


88 posted on 02/18/2013 6:52:27 AM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals
I pronounce you trim, fit, and ready for action.

I must take care of me to be able to lead.

Think: Rick Grimes in the last few episodes. LOL

89 posted on 02/18/2013 6:57:54 AM PST by Lazamataz (Republicans have the same policies as the Democrats, except for the part where they win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

funny thing about that word lead or is it lead?


90 posted on 02/18/2013 7:00:45 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Tax-chick; Silentgypsy
Laz once in great while something happens or something does not happen. Guess it could be said more of something does not happen more than something does happen or for mankind something happens everyday which we do not discuss. Now when speaking in terms of corncobs and hemorrhoids one can discern how sorrowful we should each think in terms of our nations Founders without paper. Well maybe our Founders were lucky and had a little more than parchment with which to take care of business but the people who built this nation with their hands sometimes had only their hands or a corncob with which to take care of business.

Now (insert Tax-chick's tag-line and one is able to see where am starting to wonder down this path toward a goal. Will a thought give someone or some leader pause. I really do not know. Though Sg did say, all we can do is try.

91 posted on 02/18/2013 7:22:58 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Me, too. Back to the old way. We already have a “House of the people.” We don’t a Senate for them, too.
And it will make it a LOT easier to change Senators... I wouldn’t miss Chambliss or Isakson very much.


92 posted on 02/18/2013 7:26:10 AM PST by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Tax-chick; Silentgypsy
Must set the record straight. Silentgypsy has no idea what I'm talking about though I am guilty of quoting Sg’s words typed to me, and that is all Sg is aware of. I'll die willingly if this is a lie. Sg has no idea of what me, myself and I, am proposing. Sg, my apology for dragging you into this.
93 posted on 02/18/2013 7:41:03 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

import bkmark for reference
94 posted on 02/18/2013 7:42:58 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: man_in_tx
>> You mean in places like CA, IL, NJ, and NY? They will not be elected either. <<

This would come as news to Senators Hayakawa (R-CA), Pete Wilson (R-CA), Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL), Mark Kirk (R-IL), Clifford Case (R-NJ); Al D'Amato (R-NY); and James F. Buckley (Conservative-NY). All of them were elected by the people in recent decades, and would have never been selected by the Democrat controlled legislatures of their state.

Kirk is serving right now, and D'Amato, Buckley, and Fitzgerald were staunch conservatives that had zero chance of being appointed by their liberal state governments.

95 posted on 02/18/2013 8:30:35 AM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals; fieldmarshaldj
>> Looks as though you have been here before. I’m a newbie. Any advice? <<

It's futile to explain to the anti-17th crowd who CURRENTLY runs state legislatures and what type of people they would appoint to the U.S. Senate if given the opportunity. (or even try to explain to them that appointed Senate in 1912 was a bunch of a criminals and hacks, hence the reason why amendment was ratified)

They're of the opinion that if the 17th is repealed, the state legislatures from 1789 will instantly arrive here in a time machine and appoint a bunch of Henry Clay's to serve to Washington.

Let them have their fantasy -- just don't let them nominate more politicians who agree with their Fantasyland.

Fun fact: Alabama (April 11, 2002), Delaware (July 1, 2010), and Maryland April 1, 2012) recently ratified the 17th, decades after it became law, as a symbolic show of support for an elected Senate.

The states that haven't yet ratified it are: Utah, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Virginia, and of course, Georgia (appointing Democrat Zig Zag Zell Miller to the Senate, who replaced a conservative Republican and went on cast the deciding vote to give Tom Daschle control of the Senate, was GOOD for conservatives, the kool-aid drinkers tell me)

96 posted on 02/18/2013 8:47:41 AM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Well I live in the Democratic Controlled State of California.


97 posted on 02/18/2013 9:12:19 AM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

The key problem is not whether the Senator is ellected by the direct popular vote or the indirect popular vote through the state legislature. The problem is the inability to remove a senator before the end of the six year term of office. before the 17th Amendment, the Senator could be removed by the popularly elected state legislature. After the 17th Amendment, the state legislature was powerless to remove the Senator from office. Given the politics of the U.S. Senate, it is virtually impossible to hold a rogue Senator accountable for any misconduct, even the forms of misconduct which are impeachable offenses.


98 posted on 03/01/2013 10:00:04 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

“before the 17th Amendment, the Senator could be removed by the popularly elected state legislature”

You certainly make a good point there.
But still don’t concur with your compromise proposal.
We already OVER-compromise.


99 posted on 03/01/2013 4:45:50 PM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: A'elian' nation

It wasn’t really meant to be a compromise proposal as it was a chance to get people to think about what could happen if they acutally got what they thought they wanted. they thought they wanted a popularly elected Senator, and wht they got was the lesser Senator who could not be disciplined or removedd for misconduct and misrepresentation. Likewise with all of the proposals. They keep trying to find a way to rig the system so their candidate will be the one elected, but they fail to recognize what the consequences can be after they get what they thought they wanted.

In other words, the proposal wasn;t meant to be a serious one.


100 posted on 03/01/2013 7:02:00 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson