Posted on 02/15/2013 6:15:34 PM PST by raybbr
Sobering Thoughts from the Romeike Case
By Michael Farris, J.D., LL.M. HSLDA Founder and Chairman
Having immersed myself for about eight days in writing a brief for the Romeike family (a German homeschooling family who fled to the United States for political asylum), I wanted to share some insights I gained into the view of our own government toward the rights of homeschooling parents in general.
You will benefit from some context.
The U.S. law of asylum allows a refugee to stay in the United States permanently if he can show that he is being persecuted for one of several specific reasons. Among these are persecution for religious reasons and persecution of a “particular social group.”
In most asylum cases, there is some guesswork necessary to figure out the government’s true motive—but not in this case. The Supreme Court of Germany declared that the purpose of the German ban on homeschooling was to “counteract the development of religious and philosophically motivated parallel societies.”
This sounds elegant, perhaps, but at its core it is a frightening concept. This means that the German government wants to prohibit people who think differently from the government (on religious or philosophical grounds) from growing and developing into a force in society. Dressed-up Totalitarianism
It is thought control. It is belief control. It is totalitarianism dressed up in politically correct lingo.
But my goal today is to not belabor the nature of German repression of homeschooling; rather I seek to reveal the view of the United States government to all of this.
The Romeikes’ case is before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The case for the government is officially in the name of the Attorney General of the United States. The case is called Romeike v. Holder. Thus, the brief filed by the U.S. Department of Justice is filed on behalf of the attorney general himself—although we can be reasonably certain he has not personally read it. Nonetheless, it is a statement of the position of our government at a very high level.
We argued that Germany is a party to many human rights treaties that contain specific provisions that protect the right of parents to provide an education that is different from the government schools. Parents have the explicit right to give their children an education according to their own philosophy.
While the United States government argued many things in their brief, there are three specific arguments that you should know about. No Homeschooling? No Problem.
First, they argued that there was no violation of anyone’s protected rights in a law that entirely bans homeschooling. There would only be a problem if Germany banned homeschooling for some but permitted it for others.
Now in reality, Germany does permit some people to homeschool, but it is rare and in general Germany does ban homeschooling broadly—although not completely. (Germany allows exemptions from compulsory attendance for Gypsies and those whose jobs require constant travel. Those who want to stay at home and teach their own children are always denied.)
But, let’s assess the position of the United States government on the face of its argument: a nation violates no one’s rights if it bans homeschooling entirely.
There are two major portions of constitutional rights of citizens—fundamental liberties and equal protection. The U.S. Attorney General has said this about homeschooling. There is no fundamental liberty to homeschool. So long as a government bans homeschooling broadly and equally, there is no violation of your rights. This is a view which gives some acknowledgement to the principle of equal protection but which entirely jettisons the concept of fundamental liberties.
A second argument is revealing. The U.S. government contended that the Romeikes’ case failed to show that there was any discrimination based on religion because, among other reasons, the Romeikes did not prove that all homeschoolers were religious, and that not all Christians believed they had to homeschool. “It is important that Americans stand up for the rights of German homeschooling families. In so doing, we stand up for our own.” —Michael Farris HSLDA Founder and Chairman Targeting Individual Rights
This argument demonstrates another form of dangerous “group think” by our own government. The central problem here is that the U.S. government does not understand that religious freedom is an individual right. One need not be a part of any church or other religious group to be able to make a religious freedom claim. Specifically, one doesn’t have to follow the dictates of a church to claim religious freedom—one should be able to follow the dictates of God Himself.
The United States Supreme Court has made it very clear in the past that religious freedom is an individual right. Yet our current government does not seem to understand this. They only think of us as members of groups and factions. It is an extreme form of identity politics that directly threatens any understanding of individual liberty.
One final argument from Romeikes deserves our attention. One of the grounds for asylum is if persecution is aimed at a “particular social group.” The definition of a “particular social group” requires a showing of an “immutable” characteristic that cannot change or should not be required to be changed. We contend that German homeschoolers are a particular social group who are being persecuted by their government.
The U.S. government says that Germany’s ban on homeschooling does not meet this standard because, of course, the family can change—they can simply stop homeschooling and let their children go to the public schools. After all, the U.S. government says, the children are only in public schools 22-26 hours a week. After that the parents may teach what they want. Faulty Understanding
There are two main problems with this argument. First, our government does not understand that families like the Romeikes have two goals when they chose homeschooling. There are things they want to teach and there are things they want to avoid their children being taught in the government schools.
Does anyone think that our government would say to Orthodox Jewish parents, we can force your children to eat pork products for 22-26 hours per week because the rest of the time you can feed them kosher food?
Freedom for the mind and spirit is as important as freedom for the body and spirit.
This argument necessarily means that the United States government believes that it would not violate your rights if our own government banned homeschooling entirely. After all, you could teach your children your own values after they have had 22-26 hours of public school indoctrination aimed at counteracting religious and philosophical views the government doesn’t like.
The second problem with this argument goes back to the definition of immutability. Immutable means a characteristic that cannot be changed or “should not be required” to be changed.
No one contends that homeschooling is a characteristic that cannot be changed. We simply contend that in a free nation it is a characteristic that should not be required to be changed.
Germany has signed international treaties which proclaim that parental rights are a prior right over any views of the government when it comes to education. In fact, the movement for the adoption of these treaties came in reaction to the world’s horror at broad-ranging attack on human rights that Germany perpetrated in the events surrounding World War II. Nazi Germany believed that the children belonged first to the state. The world community answered that and said, no, parental rights are prior to those of the government. Eliminating the Right to Choose
When the United States government says that homeschooling is a mutable choice—they are saying that it is a characteristic that a government can legitimately coerce you to change. In other words, you have no protected right to choose the education for your children. Our nation could remove your ability to homeschool and your choice would be mutable—since the government has the authority to force you to implement their wishes.
The prospect for German homeschooling freedom is not bright. But we should not reserve all of our concern for the views of the German government. Our own government is attempting to send German homeschoolers back to that land to face criminal prosecutions with fines, jail sentences, and removal of custody of children.
We should understand that in these arguments by the U.S. government, something important is being said about our own liberties as American homeschoolers.
The Attorney General of the United States thinks that a law that bans homeschooling entirely violates no fundamental liberties.
It is important that Americans stand up for the rights of German homeschooling families. In so doing, we stand up for our own.
• Romeikes’ Opening Brief
• Dept. of Justice’s Response to Romeikes’ Opening Brief
• Romeikes’ Reply Brief
wow... how much more disturbing can these people get?
Homeschooling ping.
This means that the German government wants to prohibit people who think differently from the government (on religious or philosophical grounds) from growing and developing into a force in society. Dressed-up Totalitarianism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What the Eff does Michael Farris think is happening right here in the USA? Only here its political correctness invoked by the Main Stream Media Strained Meme and the Continuous browbeating of the continuous 24/7 Obama campaign refrain, whioch threaten our Constitution.
Totalitarianism? Michael Farris thinks the USA is NOT (?) at risk for totalitarianism? WTF? Tiotalitarianism is here in the USA RIGHT NOW! BY EXECUTIVE FIAT! BRENNAN ran an ARMS for NO OIL deal to Al Qaeda to protect the high Saudi oil prices, by attacking and shutting down Magrab oil and gas supplies, with a later play for Israel.Thats totalitarianism. Waging war without Congressional authority.
And Mr. Farris thinks the Germans are “totalitarian?”
Buahahahahahahaha!
Read this:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
( Interesting thread Fred.)
Tell me what gave you the impression that Michael Farris doesn't know this. God prosper him: he's been writing, speaking out, and fighting against this same stuff in the USA for decades.
I agree , but why is Farris not revealing the plight right here in the USA? I would like to see a few big guns like Farris writing about it, thats all. Maybe the role of executive orders bringing about totalitarian control of our economy and business by using the EPA, for example.
The Germans have nothing on Obama.They are mere pikers compared to Obama.
He adopts a measured tone that is certainly out of place on Free Republic, but probably is more persuasive to the ideologic spectrum between right 20, which is the liberal edge on FR, to left 40 or even 35.
For some time it’s been pretty clear we ended WWII several months too soon. These people are still as authoritarian as they’ve always been.
Where does the Constitution authorize the Federal government to be involved in education? (Let alone interfere or ban certain forms)
MARK
Well, you need to remember that the German people have had some very unpleasant experiences with both Communism and Nazism. The Nazi Party is outlawed. They don't want any new Nazi Party, or Hitler Youth, getting started again in any form. And who can blame them? Unfortunately, this very honorable motive has led them down some less that perfectly honorable avenues ....
Please enlighten me. Who is 'WE'?
Wisdom of Solomon required. Let the family, who are in control of the outcome, decide.
What about the parents of the girls in Afghanistan who are terrorized (and sometimes killed) for attending school?
Is the US planning to give them and their entire families all refugee status and fight for their right to obtain an education in US courts?
(I tried to reply at length, but it all came out sounding insulting. That family sound like they have become tools.)
In 2006 the family withdrew the children from Germany’s public schools and started homeschooling because of concerns over content in modern German textbooks that violated the family’s religious beliefs. The family said the objectionable material included explicit lessons on sex, the promotion of the occult and witchcraft and an effort to teach children to disrespect authority figures.
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2011/10/355409/#tmzxOrF7WpsDwskC.99
I guess Holder never heard of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters
I bet Farris has.
He does! But this particular article is about Germany. He writes about what’s happenng in the USA, even state by state, and frequently. Is he obliged to write everything he knows, all the time, in each and every article he writes?
Plus, this IS about USA impact. The US DOJ (Obama Administration) is the one which has psuhed the LEGAL argument that educating one’s own children is not a fundamental right.
This ping list is for articles of interest to homeschoolers. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping List. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added or removed from either list, or both.
The keyword for the FREE REPUBLIC HOMESCHOOLERS’ FORUM is frhf.
This ping list is for articles of interest to homeschoolers. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping List. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added or removed from either list, or both.
The keyword for the FREE REPUBLIC HOMESCHOOLERS’ FORUM is frhf.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.