Skip to comments.
A natural gas strategy Democrats should heed
Washington Post ^
| February 14, 2013
| Editorial Board
Posted on 02/15/2013 11:23:32 AM PST by neverdem
Edited on 02/15/2013 11:29:29 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: New York
KEYWORDS: energy; fracking; naturalgas; shalegas
WaPo finds common sense about fracking!!! Who could have thunk it??? The environuts are besides themselves!
P.S. Editorial Boards write these editorials without bylines.
1
posted on
02/15/2013 11:23:37 AM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
except for this part...
"The country cant use natural gas forever, because it still produces some carbon dioxide."
2
posted on
02/15/2013 11:25:45 AM PST
by
stylin19a
To: neverdem
Quoting O is dangerous. He rarely says what he means.
3
posted on
02/15/2013 11:26:56 AM PST
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: neverdem
Liberal and common sense? Does not compute! They need to look in to the use of fracking gases, condensate and methane as raw feed stock for methanol and ethanol as well as propane for fleet vehicles, leave the petrol for the civilian market. Wanna spend billions on energy incentives? Then ditch the crap @ssed solar and wind garbage and give generous tax credits for conversion to fracking gas fed fleet vehicles.
4
posted on
02/15/2013 1:46:03 PM PST
by
nomad
To: neverdem; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson